IT has become an unofficial trademark for Glasgow, but a campaign has been launched to raise support for the removal of a traffic cone perched on one of Scotland's oldest bronze monuments.
For about twenty years, latenight revellers have climbed the statue of the Duke of Wellington - outside Glasgow's Gallery of Modern Art (Goma) - to replace the cone on the victor of Waterloo's head after it has been removed.
However critics say the socalled "Joke of Wellington" has caused serious damage to the 160-year-old statue and must be halted to prevent further deterioration. The Iron Duke has lost his spurs and half his sword, and scenes of the battle of Waterloo on the statue's plinth have been badly worn.
Gary Nisbet, an art historian, has started a campaign to save the historic monument. He said: "There is a bust of Wellington in Kelvingrove Gallery. If I put a traffic cone on its head, I would be arrested and rightly so.
"Wellington was a bampot.
He would have had no qualms about putting down the people of Glasgow if he had to. But this is an important, valuable, and beautiful statue which needs to be protected.
"Climbing on to it is an act of vandalism."
Mr Nisbet's sentiments have been backed by Charles Gordon, the city council leader, who said: "I don't like it and perhaps the joke has worn a bit thin. It is a minor act of vandalism.
He added: "I don't think anyone, drunk or sober, should be encouraged to climb up on the statue. It's dangerous."
However Alex Mosson, the city's former lord provost, once refused to be photographed for a publicity shoot at Goma unless somebody put a cone on the duke's head.
He said: "I love it. The duke is all pomp and circumstance but, with a cone on his head, it sums up Glasgow for me."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article