The Megrahi decision has been branded "perfidious, repulsive and sickening" by a group representing friends and family of the Lockerbie atrocity who are now organising a campaign on the internet advocating a boycott of Scotland and the UK.
The website boycottscotland.com stated: "The government of the United Kingdom has washed its hands of the entire affair, allowing the Scottish Government total freedom in taking this perfidious action against the families of the victims of Pan Am Flight 103.
"The actions of the Scottish Government are inexcusable. A man who is responsible for the mass murder of 270 innocent civilians must be held accountable for such a cold blooded and ruthless act. Freeing a terrorist in order to further ties with the tyrannical Libyan regime of Muammar al Gaddafi and to further the commercial interests of British Petroleum in that region is repulsive and sickening."
The website states "don't travel to Scotland or do business there (or in the United Kingdom in general) and don't buy any British or Scottish products," adding: "Americans need to respond to this outrageous miscarriage of justice and betrayal of the victims' families, who were mostly fellow Americans, by refusing to spend their tourist dollars in Scotland and avoiding any kind of business there.
"Boycotting is the only way to send a clear and direct message to both the Scottish and British governments that Americans will not tolerate such a flagrant betrayal."
Urging Americans to avoid BP petrol stations in the US and to boycott tourism and banking, the website states: "Mr MacAskill, the so-called Justice' Secretary of Scotland, you should be ashamed of yourself. You know nothing of justice, nor will we ever forgive your heinous action, and it is our sincere hope that the people of Scotland will strongly voice their opposition to what you have done.
"You have shown to the international community that your government and the United Kingdom as a whole will stop at nothing to pursue the neverending and relentless acquisition of oil revenues."
A spokesman for Alex Salmond said last night: "The strong and enduring relationship between Scotland and the United States will continue, as will the friendship between the American and Scottish people.
"One unattributed website is not a significant factor, when compared to the thousands of US citizens who visit and will continue to visit Scotland, and no responsible American will pursue this approach."
The Washington Post only included a paragraph at the bottom corner of its front-page referring to coverage inside.
And in Europe leading German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung commented: "To reprieve a seriously ill prisoner is an act of humanity," while Die Presse in Austria said: "Humanitarian decency releases the convicted assassin al-Megrahi."
In Tripoli, despite jubilant scenes at the airport, the English-language Tripoli Post reported: "Many are blaming the Scottish authorities for not taking care of Megrahi's health while in prison.
"They speculate that he was left, on purpose, to die of his cancer."
The newspaper said of the Justice Secretary's announcement that Megrahi was going home to die: "This statement reads as if the Scottish authorities have made sure that Megrahi dies within days from his release.
"In other words, Libyans are now convinced that the Megrahi case could be viewed as a premeditated murder on the part of the Scottish prison authorities."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article