UNDER pressure from farmers, the Scottish environment minister Ross Finnie is campaigning to exempt Scotland from a ban on a toxic chemical that kills wildlife.
He is demanding a decision by UK ministers to suspend marketing authorisation for sheep dips containing cypermethrin be reversed north of the Border.
But Finnie's stance has been condemned by angling organisations, who say that the chemical can be "devastatingly lethal". And the minister's campaign has not been fully endorsed by his own environmental watchdogs.
Farmers dip sheep in a chemical bath to rid them of scab, a debilitating maggot infestation which can kill. But if cypermethrin in the dip leaks into local burns, it can kill insects and fish.
An investigation in Wales last year by the government's Environment Agency uncovered 32 incidents in which leaking sheep dip had caused serious environmental damage. The 12 worst cases involved cypermethrin killing large numbers of insects and fish, and led to 10 farmers being prosecuted.
As a result, the Veterinary Medicines Directorate (VMD), which authorises the marketing of sheep dip, decided in February to ban cypermethrin until further notice. Scottish farmers claimed that the chemical hadn't been shown to cause similar problems in Scotland.
After the National Farmers' Union of Scotland met with the Scottish Executive last month, Finnie wrote to the VMD requesting a special "regional authorisation" for Scotland. "The Executive is supporting the efforts to have cypermethrin remarketed in Scotland, " the minister's spokesman told the Sunday Herald.
"It is a valuable treatment for sheep scab, which is a serious condition." The number of sheep dip incidents in Scotland had been at a "low level", he argued, and routine monitoring had not highlighted it as a "particular problem".
This is fiercely disputed, however, by angling groups like the Association of Salmon Fisheries Boards. The Executive was "turning a blind eye to the pollution impact of a devastatingly lethal chemical, " said the association's director, Andrew Wallace.
The kind of targeted monitoring of upland streams carried out in Wales had not been done in Scotland so problems had remained undetected, he argued.
"If the Executive is calling for the ban to be lifted in Scotland, then it is failing in its primary responsibility to protect Scotland's natural environment."
The Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) accepted that it had not investigated sheep dip pollution like the Environment Agency. "It is very difficult to be categorical that a problem does not exist due to the costs and practicalities of sampling on a wider scale, " said Rob Morris, Sepa's land policy manager.
"The evidence from our monitoring data does not conclusively support a ban in Scotland. However, we recognise that, with the ban in place, there is a reduced risk of pollution."
Sepa has recorded 24 cases of sheep dip pollution over the last five years, some of them significant and requiring enforcement action.
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), the government wildlife conservation agency, had "concerns" about the impact of cypermethrin. "There is certainly a clear need that any use of cypermethrin is carried out responsibly and that it is disposed of safely, " said an SNH spokesman.
The National Farmers' Union for Scotland (NFUS) agreed that cypermethrin was "jolly dangerous stuff" but only if used improperly, and insisted there was no evidence of misuse in Scotland.
Farms are monitored every four years by Sepa, and their management practices are audited every year under a quality assurance scheme, an NFUS spokesman pointed out.
"If there is a problem, show us the evidence and we'll deal with it. But please don't take away an animal welfare tool when there is no evidence because it will bring misery to millions of sheep."
NEED TO KNOW FACTS The Scottish Executive has backed a call to exempt Scotland from a UK ban on a chemical lethal to wildlife.
BACKGROUND Cypermethrin has been withdrawn in sheep dip, but can still be used by salmon farmers to kill lice.
NEED TO KNOW MORE?
http: //www. nfus. org. uk: National Farmers Union of Scotland http: //www. sepa. org. uk: Scottish Environment Protection Agency http: //www. snh. org. uk: Scottish Natural Heritage
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article