Health economist; Born October 10, 1942; Died February 18, 2008. DR STEVE Engleman, who has died aged 65, was a distinguished health economist who lectured at the universities of Glasgow and Edinburgh before working as an independent consultant for a wide range of public organisations in Scotland and in other European countries.
He was born and grew up in Brooklyn and graduated first in industrial relations (at Cornell University) and then in economics at the University of California Berkeley. His PhD - evaluating the Job Corps Programme, the key component of the Johnson administration's War on Poverty - was completed in 1971.
In the same period, he was an active participant in the free-speech movement and the student activism in support of civil rights that characterised the Berkeley campus during the 1960s. These experiences confirmed his lifelong belief in the value and importance of public services as a central feature of social policy.
Together with a new wife and daughter, he moved to Glasgow in 1971 as a lecturer in labour economics and industrial relations.
Engleman's early work on applying economic principles to professional training grew into a wider interest in healthcare that was partly stimulated by the challenge of teaching basic economic ideas to doctors and partly by engaging in innovative economic assessments of developments in obstetrics.
It was not surprising, therefore, that he moved to Edinburgh in 1978 as senior lecturer in health economics in the university's department of community medicine, a post he combined with providing economic consultancy to Lothian Health Board.
The problems of the NHS then were much the same as they are today, resting mainly on questions of human resources and the evaluation of new ways of delivering healthcare. One consequence was that Engleman found his consultancy skills in these areas in increasing demand leading, in 1988, to his decision to become an independent consultant in these fields.
Well before this time, he was no longer the American; he identified closely with the concerns and values of Scottish society. It is relevant that - throughout his career - his work was entirely focused on the objectives of public rather than private agencies.
At different periods he was a specialist adviser to House of Commons select committees on social services, health and Scottish affairs, an adviser to the Scottish Blood Transfusion Service, consultant to Audit Scotland and the Social Work Services Inspectorate, the European office of the World Health Organisation and other healthcare agencies in Europe. More recently he was a member of the Health Technology Board for Scotland. This rather dry list fails to recognise the help and support he provided both for the organisations themselves and for many people within them. The latter was, perhaps, his greatest but least public skill: that he was always available to those facing complex or difficult problems and able to provide analysis and counselling about the options open to them.
These activities aside, he found time for a wide range of other interests. First of these was an abiding enthusiasm for Balkan and Greek dancing but horse racing - and the ability to make it profitable - came a close second. He was secretary of the Edinburgh Jewish Literary Society and an active member of the recently founded Edinburgh Liberal Jewish Community (Sukkat Shalom).
His later years were clouded by ill-health following a renal cancer, several years of dialysis and then a successful transplant. None of these setbacks was allowed to impede what he regarded as more important concerns; even late in his last illness he was still debating aspects of health services policy and their likely implications. His large circle of friends will miss these conversations.
He is survived by his wife, Kathie, his daughters Heather and Hannah and his grandchildren, Joe and Catriona.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article