Mr Findlay had been working on the case since December 2007. He is to be replaced by Maggie Scott QC, who until recently led the appeal by the man convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, Adelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi.
It is understood the decision was made after discussions between Mr Sheridan and his solicitor, Aamer Anwar. Mr Findlay is understood to have been told the decision while on holiday in Singapore.
Mr Sheridan and his wife Gail are due to stand trial at the High Court in Glasgow in February. Both are accused of committing perjury during the MSP’s defamation case against the News of the World in 2006. Mr Sheridan is also accused of attempting to persuade another person to commit perjury.
The couple denied all charges at a pre-trial hearing in July and were granted bail. With around 180 witnesses named by the Crown, the Sheridans’ trial is expected to last around three months, making it the longest perjury trial in Scottish history.
Sources close to the case last night refused to comment on the reasons for the change in the defence team. In his defamation trial, Mr Sheridan successfully represented himself after sacking his legal team.
The News of the World had claimed that Mr Sheridan, while a list MSP for Glasgow and leader of the Scottish Socialist Party, had been unfaithful to his wife and visited a swingers’ club.
Mr Sheridan sued, insisting the claims were false.
After 23 days of evidence, the jury found in Mr Sheridan’s favour and awarded him £200,000 damages. However, within weeks the Crown Office instructed Lothian & Borders Police to investigate if any witnesses had lied.
Gail Sheridan is being represented in the perjury case by Paul McBride QC.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article