JIMMY Sandison was stopped for speeding on the way home from the
Airdrie match the other day. He was going at only 30mph.
Evan Balfour was in the car with him, and he was charged because he
unclipped his seatbelt before Sandison had pulled on the handbrake. Owen
Coyle was booked for being there.
Nothing of the kind happened, of course, but had these Airdrie players
been treated with such harshness by authority, no-one would have been
surprised. It could still be a form of paranoia, but it becomes
increasingly difficult to ignore the Broomfield club's plea that they
are a team of victims.
They can't say publicly -- for fear that the SFA might send them all
off to Botany Bay or, worse, Coatbridge -- but there is little doubt the
Diamonds feel the establishment is out to get them. So far this season
Airdrie players have been shown 72 yellow cards and five red. Kenny
Black has been booked 11 times and has done time on the sidelines on
four occasions.
During their match against Dundee on Saturday eight players were
booked and two sent off. All but two of the cautions were given to
Dundee players -- Ivo Den Biemen and Graham Rix were the two who walked
-- but no doubt someone somewhere is already working out a way to put
the blame on the Broomfield side.
It is being said that the SFA, who fined Airdrie #5000 last season
because of their high crime count, will examine the club's record of
behaviour today and, if the association run true to form so far as
Airdrie are concerned, they could be rounded up and shot at dawn
tomorrow.
There are two ways of looking at Airdrie's disciplinary record. First,
it just might be they are a gang of thugs who dress up as footballers
every now and then and abuse anyone who comes within kicking distance.
Secondly, they may have been given an unfair reputation as ruffians and
are forever guilty in the eyes of the referees.
Naturally enough, this is how Airdrie themselves see it, and they
would point to the behaviour of others. For instance, the crime
statistics show that Aberdeen, Hearts, and Celtic are no saints either,
yet no-one jumps up and down calling for the death penalty to be brought
back for any of their players.
Why should this be? Is there a set of rules for Airdrie alone? Are
they being victimised? Of course not, but it is probably true that
referees are less lenient with Airdrie's players than those of most
other clubs. It is also the case that not only do outsiders frown on the
team, they ridicule the ground also.
Nobody likes Airdrie, and that's a fact.
Often it seems as though some people in the business will not be happy
until Airdrie are pushed down and locked in football's cellar, commonly
referred to as the second division. However, if they are to begin a
journey down into the darkness by leaving the premier division they will
not go quietly, that's for sure, because the only thing these players
understand is grit and determination.
These are their true qualities, not any primitive desire to hurt and
break opponents. Airdrie's players can only roll up their sleeves and
run and chase and pressure. They play on a tight pitch and press up
against their opponents denying them daylight.
Airdrie are not a particularly good team because they don't have
particularly good players, but they are honest professionals who give
their all.
When Alex MacDonald was manager of Hearts and had an extremely limited
budget in the early days at Tynecastle, his team played in a similar
fashion to his Airdrie side, but there was no widespread condemnation of
his work. He was applauded. People were impressed to see so much being
done with so little, and no-one can honestly say the current Airdrie
side are more cynical or wilder than that Hearts team.
The truth is that a combination of factors, the creaking, dusty
ground, the blandness of the team, and also the disdain for the press
which exists within the Broomfield boardroom, have given Airdrie a bad
name. It has become fashionable to heap derision on this unfortunate
lot, who are merely trying to survive.
There is one other aspect of Airdrie's reputation which has led people
to believe they are monsters. Indeed, they have been described as
beasts, but the fault is not all theirs. You know, this game's real
rascals, the referees, may have a case to answer.
Airdrie played Dunfermline in the Skol Cup semi-final at Tynecastle
last season and lost the match after referee David Syme awarded the Fife
side a penalty. Syme made a mistake that night and, for a number of days
afterwards, Airdrie continued to protest and it was even suggested they
might take court action. Bad mistake.
The authorities don't like dissent of any kind. They rarely entertain
the notion that they or their officials could be at fault, and those who
suggest otherwise invariably find themselves in trouble. Just like
Airdrie? This is not to say Airdrie are entirely innocent, but neither
are they brutes. Referees are quick, almost eager, to punish Airdrie
players, who have suffered badly for trivial offences.
If you have seen any of their matches you will know they are not
really equipped to kick and frighten the opposition. They are much too
small to be football assassins. They may indeed be victims.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article