SAFEWAY poisoner Dr Paul Agutter was jailed for 12 years yesterday
after a jury found him guilty of an evil and ingenious plot to murder
his wife.
In an attempt to cover his tracks, Agutter placed tonic bottles laced
with the deadly poison atropine on the shelves of a Safeway supermarket,
showing a callous disregard for the lives of the public.
A jury at the High Court in Edinburgh convicted 48-year-old Agutter by
a majority verdict of attempting to murder his wife Alex, 39, at their
home at Kilduff Lodge, Athelstaneford, East Lothian, on August 28 last
year by putting a massive dose of atropine in her gin and tonic.
They also convicted him, again by a majority, of placing bottles
contaminated with the poison on the shelves of the Safeway supermarket
at Hunter's Tryst, New Swanston, Edinburgh, on August 24.
A number of Safeway customers became violently ill after drinking from
the spiked bottles, and shelves had to be cleared in a nationwide safety
alert.
The Crown dropped a charge stating that he also tried to murder an
11-year-old girl at Kilduff Lodge on August 28.
Agutter showed little emotion as he was jailed by Lord Morison at the
end of an eight-day trial at the High Court in Edinburgh.
The judge told him: ''This was an evil and cunningly devised crime
which was not only designed to bring about the death of your wife, but
also caused great alarm, danger and injury to the public.
''You will go to prison for a period of 12 years.''
Agutter is understood to be considering an appeal.
Lord Morison also paid tribute to the public-spirited and responsible
action of consultant anaesthetist Dr Geoffrey Sharwood Smith, whose wife
and son became seriously ill after drinking from Safeway tonic bottles
hours after Agutter had placed them on the shelves.
Dr Sharwood Smith, who uses atropine in his work, was the first to
identify the poison and its source, and also appeared in the press and
on TV warning the public of the dangers they faced.
Defence counsel Mr Neil Murray, QC, had described the type of person
who placed poisoned tonic bottles on the supermarket shelves as
conniving, cunning, devious and evil.
After three-and-a-half hours deliberation, the jury decided that the
description fitted Agutter, a gifted biochemist who had access to
atropine in his job as a reader at Edinburgh's Napier University.
The verdict leaves a number of puzzling questions to which there are
no obvious answers. The first and most compelling is why did he do it?
According to Agutter himself and his loyal wife Alex, they had drifted
apart over the years and had accepted a completely open marriage. The
fact that Agutter had a new girlfriend, mother-of-two Carole Bonsall,
was not a problem.
Mrs Agutter, who regularly visited her husband in prison while he
awaited trial, told the court that she had met Carole and she seemed ''a
perfectly nice person''. She did not consider the new relationship was
any of her business.
But, just a week before the poisoned bottles appeared on the Safeway
shelves, Agutter told a rather different story to his GP, Dr Ross
Langlands. Dr Langlands went to see an almost incoherent Agutter after a
''suicidal'' phone call to the GP's answering service.
Agutter talked about having to take out two loans to cover debts he
was incurring after a financial deal with his wife.
According to Dr Langlands: ''I think he was generally unhappy about
the way he was being treated by his wife. He felt as if she was treating
him with some contempt.
''He felt a little bit under pressure from the lady in this (new)
relationship that he ought to leave his wife and perhaps consider
marrying her.''
These may have been the pressures that pushed Agutter over the edge.
The remains of the laced gin and tonic which he had poured for his
wife in their home on the evening of Sunday, August 28 provided crucial
evidence against Agutter.
The concentration of atropine in her drink was 292 milligrammes per
litre, compared with 103mg in the bottle of tonic Agutter had bought at
Safeway the previous Wednesday and poured into his wife's gin. The
obvious explanation was that the poison had been added directly to his
wife's drink.
Why did Agutter not simply pour the drink down the sink?
It was a fatal mistake which the prosecution was able to exploit,
thanks to the vigilance of ambulanceman James Rudyj, who was called to
Kilduff Lodge to deal with a case of suspected poisoning.
The ambulanceman established that the remainder of Mrs Agutter's drink
had not been poured away, and told Agutter that he would have to take it
away with him for analysis.
Mr Rudyj recounted how, until that moment, Agutter had appeared calm
and collected.
Although it was a summer night, Mr Rudyj and Dr Judith Richardson, the
locum who called at the house, noticed the oppressive temperature in the
living room, a heat which would have speeded up the effect of the
poison.
It was significant, too, that Agutter's call for medical help did not
indicate that his wife needed to be treated with any degree of urgency.
Another vital but puzzling piece of testimony came from a jailer at
Edinburgh Sheriff Court, who insisted that Agutter had confessed all to
him after being beaten up in the cells by fellow prisoners.
Turnkey David Hill recalled: ''He said he was guilty and had no
remorse.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article