AT least one child's life could have been saved if vital clues which
led to the eventual unmasking of nurse Beverley Allitt as a serial
killer were followed up sooner, an official inquiry found yesterday.
The suffering of three other children may also have been prevented if
staff had acted earlier to piece together fragments of medical evidence
which would have painted ''an unmistakable portrait of malevolence''.
However, staff lacked the necessary leadership, energy, and drive to
piece together the jigsaw -- allowing Allitt to pursue her deadly
course.
The official inquiry, into how Allitt murdered four children and
attacked nine others at Grantham and Kesteven Hospital, Lincolnshire,
highlights a series of failures at the hospital.
But it's conclusion, that no single person or circumstance is to
blame, prompted allegations of a ''whitewash'' from unions and parents
of children murdered by Allitt.
Sir Cecil Clothier, the inquiry's chairman, said: ''The dreadful
lesson we have learnt is that no matter how numerous and skilful the
staff of a hospital may be, a malevolent, cunning, and deranged person
can nevertheless continue to commit his or her crimes.''
In future, people must be prepared to ''think the unthinkable''
whenever a patient's condition could not be accounted for.
The report, based on evidence from 94 people in the inquiry, held
behind closed doors, -- makes 12 recommendations aimed at tightening
procedures to safeguard children in hospital.
Mrs Virginia Bottomley, Health Secretary, promised action would be
taken on all the recommendations and added it was important that lessons
were learned throughout the health service.
She said: ''From the outset, we must all acknowledge -- as the report
does -- that the tragic events in Grantham were the product of a
malevolent, deranged, criminal mind. Everything else must be seen in
that light.
''The Clothier Report does identify and criticise failures of
management and communication in the hospital and it is important that
lessons are learnt from these throughout the National Health Service.
''It draws attention to the failure to take quicker action after the
first evidence of possible foul play. However, it refutes any suggestion
that Allitt could easily have been detected or stopped.''
Sir Cecil's findings and recommendations would be absorbed and applied
throughout the Health Service with ''diligence and despatch,'' Mrs
Bottomley said.
The recommendations are:
* No-one should be employed as a nurse if there is evidence of a major
personality disorder.
* Nurses should undergo formal health screening when they obtain their
first posts after qualifying.
* Employers should study nurses' record of days off sick before giving
them jobs.
* Coroners should always send copies of post-mortem examination
reports on patients to any consultant involved in their care.
* Child pathology services should be reviewed so a post mortem
examination is carried out by a specialist each time a child dies
unexpectedly or inexplicably.
* Consideration should be given to requiring a medical reference from
a GP to certify NHS candidates have nothing in their medical history
which would make them unsuitable for their chosen occupation.
* Department of Health guidelines that two sick children nurses should
be on duty at all times should be more closely observed.
* Reports of serious untoward incidents should be made in writing and
through a single known channel.
* If an alarm system fails on monitoring equipment, an untoward
incident report should be filed and equipment serviced.
* A review should be conducted of whether occupational health
departments should have access to sickness records.
* Clear procedures should be laid down for management queries to
occupational health departments about staff.
* Further consideration should be given to whether training applicants
who show signs of uncertain mental health should be refused unless they
have lived an independent life for two years.
The report says there was a breakdown in communications at the
hospital. It says there were sloppy recruitment procedures, inadequate
staffing levels on Ward Four -- the scene of the crimes -- and
indecisive senior managers who had poor operational procedures.
Two consultant paediatricians, while praised for their skill, should
have grasped sooner the ''significance of the cascade of collapses''
with which they had to deal.
The report also points to the failure of the pathology department, and
occupational health services, which did not pick up on Allitt's record.
In a statement, Sir Cecil said: ''It takes only two minutues alone
with a helpless patient to kill or injure. Nurses are bound to be alone
with their patients sometimes.
''But henceforward we must be prepared to think the unthinkable
whenever a patient's condition cannot be medically accounted for; a
member of staff might be responsible.''
Allitt probably would have satisfied her urge in almost any hospital,
the report said.
However, Grantham and Kesteven Hospital was ''on the borderline of
viability''. This probably exacerbated delays in detection.
Sir Cecil said proper staffing levels would not have prevented Allitt
from striking out -- but would have made it more difficult.
The report upset unions and staff, who claimed they were being
unfairly made to take the blame.
The two doctors criticised in the report rejected the criticisms made
against them.
Consultant paediatricians Nelson Porter and Charith Nanayakkara said
the report failed to take into account problems posed by the extreme
staff shortages on their ward.
They attacked Sir Cecil Clothier for holding the inquiry behind closed
doors and for not taking any evidence from paediatric experts.
Dr Porter said: ''Without the benefit of hindsight it is not
reasonable to suggest that the children on the ward needed protection.
''No professional, within the hospital or outside it, has ever
suggested that we should have been looking for a potential mass murderer
at this or any stage,'' he added.
Dr Nanayakkara said he found it ''most amazing'' that Sir Cecil had
criticised him and his colleague Dr Porter.
Nobody inside or outside the hospital had brought the matter to the
notice of the management or the police until the doctors did so, he
said.
Both the Royal College of Nursing and the Royal College of Midwives
said something must be done to increase staffing levels.
Mr Bob Quick, of the union Unison, said the regional health authority
should have shouldered responsibility. Instead the finger of blame was
pointed at junior staff.
''If there had been more nurses on the ward it would have dramatically
reduced the chances of Allitt harming the children,'' he said.
Mrs Creswen Peasgood, whose eight-week-old son suffered two
respiratory arrests, led calls from parents for a public inquiry.
She said that although the report stated that managers had to take a
certain blame, they had not lost their jobs.
Mrs Judith Gibson, the mother of another victim, said she believed the
report's recommendations should have been implemented already.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article