THE proposal to dismantle the Ravenscraig steelworks and ship it to
north-east Malaysia appears to have run into financial problems.
Last March, a privately-owned Indonesian company, PT Gunawan Dianjaya,
confirmed plans to buy the 2,200,000 tonne Ravenscraig facility and
relocate it in Asia.
There was talk of the #525m deal being signed within months and the
slab plant coming on stream in Malaysia by mid 1995. But, since
Scotland's Business broke that news, nothing has happened.
It now appears that the Indonesians are struggling to raise the
enormous capital needed for the project to proceed, now put at nearer
#800m than the #525m suggested last year. That is still roughly half the
cost of building a new 2,000,000 tonne capacity steel plant.
Only a fraction of that #800m would be needed to buy the Ravenscraig
equipment and ship it east. But, without banks and other financial
institutions committing themselves to the whole amount, the project
cannot proceed.
Meanwhile, weather-sensitive equipment is being mothballed at the
Motherwell works, to prevent any deterioration as the Indonesians'
search for financial backers continues.
British Steel is having no better luck selling other equipment located
at the Hunterston ore terminal on the Ayrshire coast. The terminal
itself is now owned by Clydeport, which is using it for the
trans-shipment of coal.
But, although it has attracted various expressions of interest,
Hunterston's two direct reduction plants, which convert ore into iron
pellets and are still owned by BS, have yet to find a buyer.
The direct reduction machines were never brought into production since
their installation in the late seventies. One interested party has been
prepared to invest a six-figure sum in a study to check whether they
would still work.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article