The modern design of cargo-bearing ships could mean a new role for the
proud old port of Alloa -- but first there are one or two things to be
straightened out . . .
ONE of Scotland's oldest harbours is struggling to come back to life
-- against the background of a dispute between Scotland's biggest port
authority and a Glasgow-based shipbroking firm.
Attempts by Kerr Chartering to bring ships back to the tiny
Clackmannan harbour of Alloa have been stymied by the actions of the
Forth Port Authority, who have used their powers to close the river to
vessels west of Kincardine Bridge.
Alloa first appeared in the annals of Scottish history in 1502 when
King James IV paid for the victualling of a vessel there.
The wharf remained in use until recent times and it was the existence
of Alloa Harbour which caused the Kincardine Bridge to be built in 1936
as a swing bridge.
In the eighties, however, shipping traffic dwindled. In 1980 the
bridgemaster's log showed that the bridge had been opened 19 times to
allow ships to pass upriver.
However the swing facility of the bridge was discontinued in 1988
although Christiani Nielson, the civil engineering firm who had bought
the harbour from the Port Authority in the seventies, continued to bring
tugs and barges upriver to transport goods.
In its heyday Alloa was a busy port and exported tobacco brought
through the Clyde from America to Europe. Later it exported coal and
grain. In the mid-sixties one ship a week still sailed the six miles
upriver past Grangemouth. There was also a tradition of shipbuilding:
during the Second World War tank-landing craft used in the Normandy
landings were built at Alloa.
However the harbour went into decline, partly because of the existence
of the National Dock Labour Scheme which made many small ports
uneconomic.
The scheme was abolished in 1989, and although Kincardine Bridge no
longer opened to allow river traffic to pass through, modern-designed
ships carrying between 2000 and 3000 tonnes were able to pass under it.
Geoff Prowse, a director of Kerr Chartering, explains: ''These latest
designed ships have not only a shallow draught but also a low profile in
the water. They are specifically designed to penetrate inland waterways.
''Obviously they are sea-going ships, which means that where before
barges would bring goods down rivers such as the Rhine to a port near
the sea, these ships can carry the cargo to its final destination.
''In addition, they can carry much larger cargoes which makes them
economic,''
Kerr Chartering, a wholly-owned subsidiary of John S. Braid, the
Glasgow shipping agents, spotted the opportunity to reopen Alloa Harbour
and leased the facility from Christiani Nielsen.
Says Geoff Prowse: ''We believe we can use the harbour to import coal,
raw materials for local factories, animal feeding, and fertilisers.
''Cereal, rape seed, and coal could be exported through the port and
about 150,000 tonnes a year could be handled at the existing single
wharf facility at Alloa.''
In 1991 Kerr Chartering carried out remedial work to the wharf and
began to make plans to bring vessels upriver. Last year arrangements
were made for the cargo ship the Kava Sound to pick up a cargo of coal
from the port.
However Forth Ports plc sought and were granted an interim interdict
to prevent Kerr Chartering from ''causing'' any vessel to navigate west
of Kincardine Bridge. The Glasgow company succeeded in having the
interim interdict lifted. The dispute centres around the question of the
provision of buoys and pilots to assist the safe navigation of the
six-mile stretch of river.
Forth Ports claim it would cost #45,000 to provide the navigational
aids required and want Kerr Chartering to underwrite this cost.
Following the lifting of the interdict Forth Port Authority issued a
''General Direction'' to close the waters west of Kincardine Bridge to
vessels.
This action has been criticised by the Chamber of Shipping who have
told Forth Ports that the direction should be withdrawn.
In a letter to Forth Ports it said: ''We believe that Forth Ports plc
should take immediate steps to place suitable buoys between Kincardine
Bridge and Alloa and the provision of licensed pilots in fulfilment of
your statutory duties so that the public right of navigation in this
part of your harbour may be exercised in safety.''
On the question of ''a deposit or guarantee'' to underwrite the
capital cost of the buoys, the Chamber of Shipping told Forth Ports:
''It is the ship, its owner, or his agent who are liable for such
charges, not a terminal operation.''
In a hard-hitting statement the Chamber described the actions taken by
Forth Ports as being ''vexatious and an unjustified interference with
the public right of navigation.''
The Chamber called on Forth Ports to ''fulfil its statutory
responsibilities by the provision of navigational facilities necessary
to permit safe navigation to the port of Alloa, as there is a clear
demand from commercial shipping to use those facilities. Such a course
would make the proposed General Direction unnecessary.''
To date Forth Ports have not lifted the General Direction and the
attempts by Kerr Chartering to reopen Alloa as a port appear to have
reached stalemate. Geoff Prowse is, however, determined to battle on.
''We have people interested in using the facility at Alloa,'' he says.
''When Forth Ports were privatised they did not buy the river.''
To date Forth Ports have not lifted the General Direction and the
attempts by Kerr Chartering to reopen Alloa as a port appear to have
reached stalemate. Geoff Prowse is, however, determined to battle on.
''We have people interested in using the facility at Alloa,'' he says.
''When Forth Ports were privatised they did not buy the river.''
Yesterday, however, a spokesman for Forth Ports said: ''The commercial
undertaking we seek is to cover quite substantial investment by Forth
Ports and is no different to normal custom and practice in the industry.
''Given that this estuary handles up to 22,500 shipping movements a
year, with a large proportion of hazardous cargo, we cannot allow
uncontrolled shipping in the waterway.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article