Jean Donald examines the temporary and the permanent appeal of skin
art
THE last time tattooing was fashionable was around the time Burns was
rantin' and roving in his own colourful way. Not that Rabbie would have
risked the needle, being just a wee bit of a hypochondriac (like all
sensitive folk). Not altogether unconnected with the ploughman poet
image, this was the time that the noble savage cult was sweeping through
the drawing rooms of London society. Eighteenth-century explorers were
bringing back their discoveries -- including the odd bewildered South
Sea Islander and African tribesman -- to prove man's simple and sweet
nature was basic and that it was only social pressures that made them
power-seeking maniacs.
Having one's ankle tattooed proclaimed a psychological closeness with
nature in the way buying organic potatoes proclaims our present-day
efforts to improve the quality of our physical environment. The
significance of the gesture was probably just as futile then as now.
Since then the way we view tattoos has definitely lost its charm and
certainly its elitist image. Sailors rather than salon intellectuals
became the greatest enthusiasts, for medical rather than aesthetic
reasons according to one of Scotland's top tattooists. ''They found it
cured gonorrhea,'' Edinburgh-based tattooist Billy Hooper told me,
rolling up his sleeves before starting on his next customer. His arms
are covered in old-style crude tattoos with thick lines, including the
old battle cry Death Before Dishonour. ''The paint in those days had a
high cadmium content which induced a fever and did act as a cure.''
Japan has its social history of tattooing as well. Prisoners were
identified by tattoos. ''The upper classes did not use them but
tradesmen, actors, actresses used them as a form of rebellion and
identifying with the masses. They were usually images of cult heroes.''
Nowadays both the needles and the colour pigments are finer than ever
before and the tattoo cult is undoubtedly growing. In America, and where
they go we are never far behind, there are tattoo conventions (in
Britain there is one in Dunstable every autumn) and last year the first
Inkslingers Ball was held in Hollywood.
Tattooists have changed too. Mr Hooper's premises are not luxurious, a
bit like a not-so-smart GP's surgery. Customers sit waiting.
''Appointments are not good. Too many people fail to turn up. But it's a
long way from the old image of the tattooist in some dark, dismal
back-street den with a plastic bucket of dirty water on one side and the
needle working from a grimy old car battery on the other.''
Billy's father was a tattooist and he worked in Hamilton before moving
to Edinburgh. ''Until a few years ago we did have a Glasgow University
professor who came here to have new tattoos quite regularly. When he was
dressed you couldn't see anything but he must have surprised people. Now
I'd say that nurses and hairdressers were the most common professions of
my clients and in the past few years there are often more women than men
in the waiting room, which is quite a change.''
Business booms when there's a production of the cult Rocky Horror Show
in town. ''And when an Army unit closes. It's 20 years since the
Cameronians disbanded but I did hundreds of cap badges.''
Despite a tentative acceptance by the fashion world, the image of
tattooing is still pretty downmarket. ''The worst thing that happened
was in the sixties when some psychologist claimed that people with
tattoos have criminal tendencies. You'd think it would be the last thing
serious criminals would want to have because they would be so easily
identified.''
That psychologist may, of course, have saved a lot of heartbreak.
There are many people, including Paula Yates, who regret their tattoos.
''Tattoos are permanent and that's that. The new methods make it more
difficult rather than easier because the colours are brighter and the
dyes more permanent.''
With so much flesh on show at this time of year and over-bronzed skin
as fashionable as designer grunge, tattoos are certainly a safe
alternative to suntan and ageing skin. Billy says black and white is
best if you want to sunbathe as colours fade more quickly in the
sunshine.
Not quickly enough for some, however. Laser therapy can cost hundreds
of pounds to remove tattoos, plastic surgery is expensive, and more
serious problems, like skin cancer, take priority. On top of that,
rightly or wrongly, tattoos can be a social and economic handicap as
they are not what most people, and especially employers, see as valuable
assets.
On the other hand they can be hidden, as in the case of Billy's
professor, and certainly the jokey temporary kind are fun and
fashionable. A permanent commitment is something else.
Temporary contemporaries
CIGARETTE paper, vegetable dye, cosmetic colours -- and 10 minutes
later I'm the proud owner of a hand-painted pink rose tattoo. It was
raining so, dedicated investigative scribe that I am, I pulled up my
sleeve and had the outline traced and then the flower painted on my arm.
That was a mistake. Shoulders are safer, but it was chilly.
It was irritating me within minutes, not physically but everytime I
moved my hand or my arm there it was, growing there. You wanted to brush
it off but couldn't. It must be heartbreaking if you've done that and
it's permanent.
My rose lasted a few days, one of a range of designs from a tattoo
system that Paul Jacobs has imported to Britain from America. Paul is
based in Edinburgh and has an outlet in Covent Garden.
The Temptu Europa paint-on system has been used now for a clutch of
films including Robert De Niro's chilling tattoos in Cape Fear (the only
real one is the panther on his arm) and the idea has now been accepted
by the business world -- instead of a karaoke night you entertain your
clients by employing a tattoo artist for the evening.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article