Iran has been training Iraqi militiamen to use the roadside bombs believed to have killed more than a dozen British soldiers in the past two years, US intelligence sources confirmed yesterday.
The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (RGC) has drafted in combat-experienced instructors from the Lebanese Hizbollah guerrilla movement to train Shi'ite insurgents operating in the UK sectors of Maysan province and Basra.
Ahmad Abu Sajad al Gharawi, a former Mahdi Army militia commander, was named yesterday as the leader of the main Iran-trained group in Maysan.
He is believed to have been responsible for the attack that killed Lance-Corporal Alan Brackenbury, whose death in 2005 near Al Amarah gave coalition investigators their first direct links between the lethal new booby-traps and Iran.
As revealed by The Herald yesterday, forensic evidence from the ambush site showed that an explosively-formed projectile (EFP) - a copper slug capable of penetrating the armour of a 70-tonne US Abrams tank - had been used to destroy the British Land Rover. Military-grade P4 plastic explosive traceable to Iran was also found.
Military engineers who examined the equipment said it was identical to bombs supplied by the RGC to Hizbollah militiamen fighting Israeli troops in Lebanon. Radio receivers used as back-up detonators were set to Iranian military frequencies.
Al Gharawi, who is now on the Iraqi government's most-wanted list, replaced Ahmad Jawwad al Fartusi, another Mahdi splinter group commander known to have imported EFPs for use against coalition troops before his arrest by British forces in September, 2005.
An intelligence source said yesterday: "We have known for a long time that the RGC has been stirring up trouble among the Shi'ite militias. What we lacked was - almost literally - a smoking gun to tie them to the active insurgency.
"That's now coming together, piece by piece, starting with the killing of L-Cpl Brackenbury. The use of Hizbollah as a proxy advisory group also ties the RGC to the insurgency.
"Hizbollah is bankrolled, trained and armed by the RGC and does not make a move without that group's permission."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article