A CANADIAN study which claims the country's minimum alcohol pricing laws have helped curb drinking has been hailed by the Scottish Government as the "first concrete evidence" that the policy could help tackle Scotland's own drinking culture.
Researchers at the University of Victoria's Centre for Addictions Research examined data spanning two decades, looking at the effect of minimum pricing policies on alcohol consumption in British Columbia.
They found that a 10% increase in minimum prices of all alcoholic drinks led to a 3.4% reduction in consumption.
The centre's director, Tim Stockwell, said: "This is significant information for policies to prevent the substantial toll of death, injury and illness associated with hazardous alcohol use. Our results support having a standard minimum price per standard drink for all alcoholic beverages as a cornerstone of alcohol problem prevention."
Minimum prices in British Columbia vary by alcohol type, with spirits priced differently than beer, wine and alcopops.
However, under the current rules one 341ml bottle of beer with an 8% alcohol content may not be sold for less than $1.21 (78 pence) or 75 cents (50 pence) for a "standard drink" – such as a small glass of wine or an alcopop with 5% alcohol content.
Chris Auld, co-author of the study, said: "Further research will assess which drinkers and which alcohol-caused harms respond most to minimum prices, yet our initial results suggest minimum pricing effectively reduces drinking."
Health Secretary Nicola Sturgeon said the findings provided "the first concrete evidence that minimum pricing does impact on alcohol consumption".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article