THE first ever blueprint for Scottish high-speed rail services is being drawn up, it has emerged.
Keith Brown, the Transport Minister, revealed that HS2, the company set up by the Department of Transport to draw up feasibility plans for high-speed rail south of the Border, has now been asked to examine proposals to extend services to Scotland.
Brown says the link to Scotland "will happen" and has the potential to be up and running before the London-Birmingham link.
Two years ago, Network Rail estimated that journey times from London to Glasgow could be more than halved to little more than two hours with a new high-speed link.
Less than two weeks ago, phase one of the £33 billion high-speed rail network connecting London and Birmingham was given the go-ahead by the Government and should be running by 2026.
UK Transport Secretary Justine Greening – who has called the line "the most significant transport infrastructure project since the building of the motorways" – said a second phase would reach Manchester and Leeds by about 2033. A consultation on the second phase will be launched in 2014.
The first phase will shave half an hour off journeys between London and both Glasgow and Edinburgh, which currently take about four hours and 30 minutes. The second phase will save a further half-hour.
The Scottish Government said at the time that it was "disappointed" that Greening's announcement did not include a commitment to bring high-speed rail to Scotland, and Brown said that they would continue to push for a verbal commitment from the Coalition Government.
However, Brown said that since then Westminster has sanctioned HS2 to examine how high-speed rail could be brought north. But he was still critical of how Westminister has handled the issue.
He said: "The company involved in developing the routes so far is now going to be talking about coming to Scotland and that's good news.
"What we would like to have happened, when Ms Greening made her announcement, was [a statement] that we are going to have a high-speed link to Scotland. She could have said they would have discussions with the Scottish Government as to how we deliver and fund it. They could have said we are looking in the future to come to Scotland, but didn't.
"They [Westminster] have been talking about a high-speed rail network for Britain, but this is not for Britain, it's not even for the whole of England."
The developments came after discussions between Brown and Westminster Transport Minister, Mike Penning.
Brown said: "What I said to Penning was that the high-speed rail company that has been established has now to start engaging with the Scottish Government, not after 2026. And he agreed.
"The exact route of [the line in Scotland] is something that has to be worked on and that early engagement is the one welcome part of the announcement."
The Scottish Government hopes to further drive home its case for the benefits of a UK-wide high speed train service at the High Speed Rail Conference in London this Thursday, to be attended by Greening.
Brown believes that the environmental case for high-speed rail is heightened if it extends to Scotland, as it would reduce the number of people who would fly between Scotland and England.
He added: "England will benefit as well by having this connection. First of all it alleviates congestion at Heathrow and the south-eastern airports. It helps the environment there and here, it helps business, here and in England."
Brown believes Scotland's end of the project could be partly funded through money heading north via the Barnett formula, because of the high-speed network commitment south of the Border. "Barnett consequentials" are calculated to ensure that a particular change in public expenditure in one geographical area leads to a change in public expenditure in others that are proportionate to population.
He said: "It is a big investment, I don't deny that, but other countries have done it and benefited from it and I think we can do likewise. Scotland wants it."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article