A FARMER has admitted owning a banned pesticide that has killed hundreds of birds in Scotland.
Tom McKellar, 50, pled guilty at Oban Sheriff Court to possessing carbofuran, which is so deadly a single grain can kill a bird while just a quarter of a teaspoon could be fatal to humans.
Officers investigating the discovery of a dead golden eagle found McKellar with the substance in three containers at his property at Bridge of Orchy in Argyll in June 2009. He told police he had used it on meat left out for foxes to eat.
McKellar, who will be sentenced next month, has already been ordered to carry out 300 hours of community service after admitting illegally owning a revolver and a pistol which were also found during the police search.
Defence lawyer David McKie said his client was pleading guilty to possessing the poison in June 2009 but not to killing an eagle.
The solicitor said the dead eagle was not found on land surrounding McKellar's property but on Forestry Commission ground several miles away.
Mr McKie handed a sheaf of glowing testimonials on his client to Sheriff Douglas Small, who conceded they were "brilliant".
But the sheriff said he had to consider all options when sentencing and this was "a serious matter". He deferred sentence till May 29 for background reports.
Afterwards, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds chief investigator in Scotland, Ian Thomson, said: "It is disappointing nobody was charged with killing the eagle. But we are grateful to the police and Crown Office for taking the matter so seriously."
Charles Everitt, of the National Wildlife Crime Unit, said: "To leave unlawful pesticide in open spaces can have disastrous consequences."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article