Iran set out its position ahead of nuclear talks with world powers yesterday by saying it will never suspend its uranium enrichment programme and sees no reason to close the Fordow underground site.
Last month a senior US official said the United States and allies would demand Iran halt higher-grade enrichment and close the Fordow facility – which has been used to expand Iran's enrichment programme – at talks on May 23 over Tehran's nuclear stand-off with the West.
However, Iran's ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Ali Asghar Soltanieh, said he saw no justification for closing Fordow, which he said was under IAEA surveillance.
"When you have a safe place under IAEA control, then why do you tell me that I should close it?" he said, making clear Iran built the site to protect its nuclear programme against Israeli or US attack. We have spent a lot of money and time to have a safe place," Mr Soltanieh added.
Iran and major powers resumed talks in mid-April in Istanbul after a gap of more than a year. They are seen as a chance to ease escalating tension and help avert the threat of a new Middle East war.
The West says Iran's nuclear work is a cover for making atomic bombs and wants verifiable assurances to the contrary from Tehran, possibly by accepting more intrusive UN inspections and limiting its uranium enrichment capacity.
Iran denies having a weapons agenda, saying it is enriching uranium for peaceful energy purposes. Refined uranium can be used to fuel nuclear power plants, which is Iran's stated aim, or provide the core for a bomb if processed more.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article