OPPOSITION parties have accused SNP deputy leader Nicola Sturgeon of a gaffe over claiming an independent Scotland would be able to appoint members to the Bank of England committee that sets interest rates for the United Kingdom.
Labour claimed her position did not make sense and the Tories said Scotland would not be in a position to demand a seat on the powerful monetary policy committee (MPC).
The row broke out yesterday following an exchange between Ms Sturgeon and Scottish Labour's deputy leader, Anas Sarwar, on BBC Scotland's Big Debate programme on Sunday.
First Minister Alex Salmond has said an independent Scotland would keep using the pound and Mr Sturgeon was asked by Mr Sarwar how it was credible to have a foreign country set Scotland's interest rates, spending limits and borrowing limits.
Ms Sturgeon said that although there was no Scottish representation on the MPC at the moment it was "something that would change if Scotland was independent and in addition we'd get the fiscal levers that we don't have".
No political party has representation on the MPC but the Chancellor nominates four external members of the nine-strong committee currently headed by Bank of England Governor Sir Mervyn King.
Ms Sturgeon claimed a Scottish Finance Secretary "could appoint somebody as well and give Scottish representation that we do not have just know".
Shadow Scottish Secretary Margaret Curran said: "Nicola Sturgeon's latest position doesn't make any sense. Bald assertions won't win many converts to her cause and shows the SNP are just making it up as they go along.
"But there is a more profound question. If Scotland leaves the UK, but the UK then sets our currency, interest rates, borrowing levels, fiscal rules and monetary policy until such a point until Scotland joins the euro, why on earth would that be better?"
Tory finance spokesman Gavin Brown said: "One of the biggest risks to Scotland maintaining its triple A status is allowing Nicola Sturgeon to comment on the econ- omy. This is yet another economic gaffe from her and the SNP."
A spokesman for Ms Sturgeon said: "The cast-iron position is that an independent Scotland will keep the pound. There is no prospect of joining the euro in the short or medium term, and as the position of Sweden makes clear, no member state of the EU can be made to join the single currency. In terms of the Bank of England's monetary policy committee, the Deputy First Minister was merely repeating her previously reported suggestion that it would be entirely reasonable for an independent Scottish Government to appoint someone to the MPC in exactly the same way as the UK Chancellor currently does."
Meanwhile, a political analyst has claimed Alex Salmond has a mountain to climb to overturn poll ratings and win an independence referendum.
Peter Kellner of YouGov was referring to the poll his organisation conducted last week for Alistair Darling of the pro-Union campaign showing 57% opposed to independence and only 33% in favour on the eve of the Yes campaign launch.
He said: "The mountain Salmond must climb is even higher than those figures suggest," pointing to past experience in constitutional polls where there tends to be a swing back towards the status quo in the later stages. "To have a good chance of winning a referendum on independence in 2014, I reckon Salmond should be aiming for the 'yes' lead, as recorded by polls in the weeks leading up to the campaign, to be approaching two-to-one."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article