ONE of Scotland's newer universities has beaten its older rivals to come top in a new poll that measures student satisfaction.
Heriot-Watt University in Edinburgh, founded in 1966, topped the 2012 National Student Survey ahead of institutions such as St Andrews, Edinburgh and Glasgow.
The university, which came third last year, had an overall satisfaction rating of 91%, just behind prestigious institutions such as Cambridge and Oxford, which both had a 92% rating.
The figures also show the popularity of the Open University in Scotland, which topped the poll with a satisfaction rating of 94%.
Dr James Miller, director of the Open University in Scotland, said: "Once again we are overwhelmed by the positive feedback from our students."
Overall, Scottish universities performed well in the survey, recording a higher rate of student satisfaction than universities in England and Wales. Students at Scotland's universities rated their overall satisfaction at 86%, compared to an 84% satisfaction rating for English and Welsh universities.
The survey, which asked students to rate six categories including the quality of academic support and personal development, also showed Scottish universities had either maintained or improved their performance compared to last year.
Student satisfaction levels at Scottish universities:
Heriot-Watt, Edinburgh – 91%
Dundee – 90%
St Andrews – 90%
Aberdeen – 89%
Glasgow – 89%
Strathclyde, Glasgow – 89%
Robert Gordon, Aberdeen – 87%
Stirling – 87%
Glasgow Caledonian – 85%
West of Scotland, Paisley – 85%
Edinburgh – 83%
QMU, Edinburgh – 83%
Edinburgh Napier – 82%
Glasgow School of Art – 77%
Abertay, Dundee – N/A
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article