A UNION representative for backroom police staff will today tell MSPs that the Government's policies are "economic madness".
Dave Watson, of Unison, will tell Holyrood's Justice Committee that artificially maintaining 2000 police officers for the sake of an electoral pledge will lead to the loss of 3200 police support staff.
He will say: "Taking trained operational police officers off the streets to perform administrative or specialist tasks – at greater cost – is economic madness. It is also contrary to the Best Value provisions in the Act. This will return the police service in Scotland to almost the 1980s, with inefficient and outdated police practice."
Unison argues that the Scottish Police Authority and the Chief Constable should be free to decide the correct balance of police officers and police staff using Best Value principles.
"They should not be subject to a political direction from the Cabinet Secretary for Justice that effectively restricts cuts to police staffs," says the Unison submission.
Mr Watson will tell the committee the new single force must not be constrained by the Government insisting on maintaining police officer numbers at the figure of 17,234.
He argues that this limits how the force can make savings and is the key factor in proposals which could see up to 3200 vital police support staff posts axed, with potentially up to 2000 police officers taken off fighting crime full time to provide cover.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article