A TAXI driver who won a nine-year battle to clear his name after being wrongly convicted and jailed for racially aggravated harassment is now launching a compensation case against the Scottish Government.
Colin McIntyre, 47, from Cumbernauld, North Lanarkshire, has instructed his lawyer to seek damages for his wrongful imprisonment and lengthy fight to clear his name which he says has ruined his life. His relationship broke down and he lost his livelihood following his conviction in 2001.
Mr McIntyre's ordeal began on Sunday, March 4, 2001, in the Mollinsburn Inn, Cumbernauld Road, Mollinsburn, when he verbally abused local councillor Balwant Singh Chadha.
The following day Mr McIntyre returned to the pub and apologised to staff but police had begun an investigation and were on the premises. He gave them a voluntary statement.
On March 6, he apologised in writing to Mr Chadha, who wrote back, accepting the apology. The pair met and shook hands.
Mr McIntyre was duly charged with acting in a racially aggravated manner and pled guilty by letter on June 5, 2001. However, unknown to Mr McIntyre, Mr Chadha – who was born in India – had been the victim of racially abusive messages left on his telephone answering machine.
Mr Chadha told police he recognised Mr McIntyre's voice on his answering machine and on June 9 the taxi driver was detained and questioned about the calls.
He denied any involvement. The interview was recorded and passed to an expert for analysis. After a lengthy investigation Mr McIntyre was charged with making the phone calls.
In court he pled not guilty, but was convicted on the expert's evidence. He was sentenced to 21 months, but immediately appealed both the conviction and sentence and was released on bail after a week in Barlinnie. Neither the Crown nor the defence had produced any evidence relating to telephone records.
Prior to the trial Mr McIntyre had heard a man called Alan Burns admitted making the phone calls. Mr Burns had been cited to appear as a defence witness but failed to show.
Mr McIntyre hired a private investigator, who tracked down Mr Burns and got him to sign an affidavit confirming he had phoned Mr Chadha. Mr Burns also agreed to provide a recording of a voice sample which an expert later said was most likely to be the person who made the abusive calls. This new evidence was presented at two appeals against conviction in 2005, but judges rejected both on technicalities.
Mr McIntyre spent four more years on bail before his appeal against his 21-month sentence was heard. The court cut it to 12 months. After serving six months in Saughton he continued to fight to clear his name.
In 2010, his case was referred to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which ruled he may have been a victim of a miscarriage of justice. In their view: "The evidence on which the Crown case relied is now fatally compromised."
Two months ago the Appeal Court quashed the conviction and sentence.
Lawyer Cameron Fyfe said: "Colin's life has been turned upside down as a result of this wrongful conviction and he has instructed me to make a claim for compensation against the Scottish Government. These claims are notoriously difficult. In a case such as Colin's you have to prove the circumstances are exceptional. My principal argument will be that it is surely exceptional for an innocent man to be imprisoned for a crime he clearly did not commit. If the Scottish Government do not regard that as exceptional, it does not say much for the quality of our justice system."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "While we cannot comment on individual cases, arrangements exist to compensate people convicted of a criminal offence that is subsequently quashed by the Appeal Court and who meet the eligibility criteria."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article