The Scottish Government's failure to comply with its legal requirement to make information public is a cause for concern, the freedom of information watchdog has said.
Information Commissioner Rosemary Agnew criticised Scottish ministers for failing to respond to requests from journalists.
One request from the Sunday Herald was "mislaid" for three months, while another from the Mail on Sunday newspaper has gone unanswered for over four months without explanation.
Ministers failed to comply with their legal requirement to respond in 20 days in both cases.
The Sunday Herald ruling stated: "As the ministers did not provide a response to (reporter) Tom Gordon's requirement for review within 20 working days, the commissioner finds that they failed to comply.
"She notes that in their response to Mr Gordon's requirement for review, they apologise for the delay in responding and explained that his request was mislaid after it was received."
The Mail on Sunday ruling stated: "Given the time which has elapsed since the requirement for review, she views with some concern the ministers' inability to confirm compliance, or a projected date for compliance, at the time of this decision."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "Scotland has the most robust freedom of information regime in the UK and continues to strive for improved performance.
"While the Scottish Government always tries to respond to FoI requests in a timely and effective manner, it received its highest number of requests on record so far last year. In addition, we continued to answer large volumes of routine requests and other correspondence on a daily basis.
"At the end of last year we passed an FoI Bill through Parliament to further strengthen the Scottish freedom of information legislation, including paving the way for information to be made available to the public earlier, ensuring that it remains robust and fully fit for purpose.
"We also proactively publish a huge range of information about all aspects of our work."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article