MEN who wear kilts have better quality sperm and are therefore more fertile, Scottish researchers claim.
They say that wearing a kilt traditionally – without underpants – could provide the ideal environment for sperm.
For testicles to produce adequate levels of sperm, they need to be three degrees Celsius lower than body temperature.
But recent research has shown there has been a global decline in the quality of men's semen over the past 50 years.
In addition to this, there has been a decline in fertility rates across the industrialised world.
Although the reasons for this are many and complex, it is thought that a reduction in sperm quality has played a role.
It is not fully understood why sperm quality is deteriorating but changes in lifestyle and increased pollution have been suggested as possible factors.
But, the new research, published in the Scottish Medical Journal, could provide men with a solution to their poor quality sperm. It said that since the 1980s scientists have linked tight-fitting underwear to impaired male fertility.
This was proven in 1990 when experts found tight pants increased the temperature deep inside the testicles.
Experts say that tight-fitting pants are partly responsible for declining fertility.
On average, tight undergarments increased the temperature of the air surrounding the testicles by 3.5 degrees celsius.
Dr Erwin Kompanje, who wrote the review, said a recent study found that there are even more serious effects of not airing a man's groin. Not only did it slow production, but it caused the testicles to produce substandard sperm which could not swim to fertilise the egg.
The study said: "It seems plausible that men should wear skirts and avoid trousers, at least during the period during which they plan to conceive."
The study added that wearing a kilt provides strong psychological benefits to men too as "it will get you noticed no matter where you are".
Ellen Thomas
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article