Environmentalists are demanding urgent investigations into air pollution on the Glasgow subway after a snapshot survey by the Sunday Herald's New Era magazine discovered passengers were breathing in tens of millions of tiny metallic particles that might damage their health.
The investigation found levels of pollution by microscopic particles on the subway – known in the city as the Clockwork Orange – up to 10 times higher than on the streets outside and up to eight times above the World Health Organisation's recommended daily limit.
Experts estimate passengers on the subway for 45 minutes could each inhale 60 million particles. Anyone spending the same amount of time at one of Scotland's busiest railway stations could breath in 10 million particles, or 2.5 million on a Glasgow-to-Edinburgh train journey.
Because the particles in the electricity-powered subway are likely to be mostly iron oxide from the grinding of wheels against rails, they may not be as dangerous as the sooty particles emitted by trains or diesel-powered cars. But experts and campaigners agree the risks require serious examination.
Dr Richard Dixon, the director of Friends of the Earth Scotland, described the concentrations of particle pollution on the subway as alarming. He called on Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT), which runs the subway, to take the results very seriously.
"This problem urgently needs further investigation. Confirmation of these results would require decisive action to reduce pollution."
Alison Johnstone MSP, environment spokeswoman for the Scottish Greens, urged SPT to respond urgently to New Era's findings. "They should ensure that Glaswegians don't find they escape polluted air on the streets only to suffer even more severe problems underground," she said.
Air pollution was measured on a 40-minute subway journey on the afternoon of Friday, May 10. A portable, state-of-the-art monitor detected concentrations of between 40 million and 80 million particles per cubic metre of air.
In Glasgow Central station levels peaked at just in excess of 40 million, and at Edinburgh Waverley station they just topped 10 million. In Glasgow city centre they once registered at more than 10 million, but were otherwise lower.
The air pollution expert who helped with the monitoring, Dr Sean Semple from the University of Aberdeen, agreed the high levels in the subway required investigation. Concentrations of tiny particles can be much higher in cars, trains, buses, railway stations and other enclosed spaces than outdoors, he pointed out. "These tend to be the places where we spend most of our time and yet they are the environments that we know least about in terms of air quality," he said.
Air pollution has been linked to asthma, heart attacks and strokes, and blamed by Government experts for causing 29,000 early deaths every year in the UK.
However, SPT described the Sunday Herald survey as sensational and alarmist. It complained it had not been shown the full scientific evidence, or details of how the survey was conducted.
"There are a huge array of factors during even the shortest journey which can impact on pollution monitors, and it is not clear from this snapshot if that has been taken into consideration," said an SPT spokeswoman.
"However, SPT takes both passenger and staff health very seriously and uses respected industry expertise to guide us on best practice in the subway."
This weekend, New Era also publishes the first ever maps revealing the most polluted streets in Glasgow, Edinburgh and Perth. Large parts of the city centres are shown to breach safety limits.
Local authorities have identified 13 urban areas across Scotland where air pollution is a problem. As well as Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee, Aberdeen and Perth, these include Bearsden, Paisley, Falkirk, Broxburn and Dunfermline.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article