A move to win a special designation giving legal protection to Scotland's wild land has failed in the Scottish Parliament, but the John Muir Trust (JMT) has vowed to continue the fight.
The wild land charity said it was disappointed that Holyrood's Public Petitions had decide to close the petition it had presented calling for a national wild land designation. Disappointed also that the Scottish Government had for now set its face against it.
Stuart Brooks, JMT chief executive, said that at least the debate had led politicians across the spectrum acknowledging that Scotland's wild land was of national importance and needs more robust protection.
"Whatever today's decision, this is an idea whose time is coming," he said.
In the meantime, the current planning system was failing lamentably to afford wild land the protection it needed, the JMT claimed.
A JMT statement pointed to recent planning decisions by the Highland Council when officials recommended 'no objection' to large scale wind farm developments that "...could lead to the loss of vast tracts of core wild land and the destruction of peat bogs that lock in great stores of carbon."
John Hutchison, JMT Chairman, said: "Wild land should be afforded the same status as National Parks and National Scenic Areas, because it is too precious to be fought over.
"As Scottish Government Ministers acknowledged, 58% of our best wild land lies outwith existing national designations."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article