Two of the country's most prestigious academic bodies have raised significant questions over the future of research funding for Scottish universities in the event of a vote for independence.
The Royal Society of Edinburgh and the Royal Society of Chemistry have laid out a range of issues that need to be addressed if the country's science base is to remain competitive, in submissions to the independent Scottish Science Advisory Council.
Scottish universities benefit significantly from research funding from the UK research councils and from major research charities such as the Wellcome Trust.
Scotland has about 8.5% of the UK's population, but wins about 15% of public and charitable research funding.
Scottish institutions won £229 million of research-council funding in 2011/12 and £121m of UK charities' competitive funding in the same year.
The fear is that in an independent Scotland there would be less incentive for English-based research councils and charities to favour Scottish institutions.
In January, UK Universities and Science Minister David Willetts said an independent Scotland would need to find more than £220m in funding for academic research to replace support that it would lose from the UK's seven research councils.
Scottish Science Minister Alasdair Allan had previously suggested an independent Scotland could co-operate with the rest of the UK and continue to pay into a joint research council.
In its submission, the Royal Society asks if the science and engineering base in Scotland could continue to access funding on a UK basis.
"On what basis would the science and engineering base in Scotland continue to access funding from the major research charities and trusts, given that most of them are English registered and operated charities? Would their present constitutions allow this?" the submission asks.
"If these sources of research funding were no longer accessible to Scottish researchers, or only available on a much more restricted basis than at present, what alternative sources of comparable funding could be made available?"
The paper questions if the financial consequences for research funding would affect the ability of Scots institutions to attract and retain outstanding researchers.
The Royal Society of Chemistry added: "If Scotland became independent, would it be feasible to maintain a UK-wide research council framework?
A Scottish Government spokesman said the country had an outstanding record of success in attracting funding that "will continue with independence".
"Our commitment to support our universities and to recognise the full impact of their research is widely recognised in the sector. We fully understand the importance of long-term stability and will set out our plans for higher education in due course."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article