UKIP leader Nigel Farage, undaunted by his high-profile public confrontation in Edinburgh a month ago, will return to Scotland next Tuesday to campaign in the Holyrood by-election for Aberdeen Donside.
His spokesman said that Mr Farage was determined to hit the stump on behalf of the party's candidate Otto Inglis and has been buoyed by local polls that put Ukip on 8%; double the level for the Liberal Democrats.
"Nigel feels the need to return to Scotland because he believes the by-election is important; all elections are important. It's only the Westminster bubble which doesn't take Scotland seriously."
Last month, Mr Farage had to seek refuge in an Edinburgh pub as the police were called in after chaotic scenes took place when the Ukip leader sought to stage a press conference on the Royal Mile.
After protesters shouted the party leader down, the incident was dubbed "the siege of The Canons' Gait".
Later, Mr Farage blamed the clash on "racist" and "anti-English" independence supporters.
For his part, First Minister Alex Salmond said at the time: "We can frankly do without Ukip, who dislike everybody and know absolutely nothing about Scotland."
The spokesman for Mr Farage said the Ukip leader now regarded the incident in the Scottish capital as "water off a duck's back".
He went on: "What happened in Scotland was not reflective of the people of Scotland but merely a bunch of radical students you find in university towns and was merely a reflection of an extreme wing of Scottish Nationalism."
The SNP's Mark McDonald is favourite to win the seat where his colleague, Brian Adam, whose death sparked the by-election, took more than 55% of the vote in 2011 with a majority of 7175.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article