FUNDING for homeopathic clinics used by hundreds of patients a year is to be axed by a major Scottish health board.
NHS Lothian has announced that, following a major consultation process, it is to "move away" from providing homeopathic services – including sending patients to Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital.
The decision follows a survey, conducted for the health board, which found 72% of respondents did not want NHS Lothian to pay for this controversial form of care.
Homeopathy is a branch of alternative medicine based on the use of highly diluted substances that practitioners claim can cause the body to heal itself.
While some patients find the approach very beneficial, the weight of scientific evidence is yet to show it is effective and NHS managers around the UK have reviewed funding for the treatments.
However, John Cook, chairman of the British Homeopathic Association, said shutting the NHS Lothian service would not save money. He said: "Concerns have already been expressed by NHS Lothian itself that withdrawing funding for homeopathy will result in an increase in GP appointments, referrals to secondary care services and prescribing costs for conventional medicine."
Homeopathy services in NHS Lothian include clinics at three venues as well as referrals to the Glasgow centre on the Gartnavel General site. In 2010/11, the clinics received approximately 200 new referrals and provided 1573 appointments.
The Glasgow Homeopathic Hospital and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde said it was a "sustainable service". How-ever, the board added: "We are reliant on the ongoing commitment from other boards to make use of the inpatient services to maintain their viability. We will therefore examine the impact of NHS Lothian's decision. Any changes which may arise as a result of funding decisions by NHS boards in Scotland would be the subject of full consultation with staff and patients."
The British Medical Association in Scotland has repeatedly called for public funding of the hospital to cease unless evidence is offered to prove homeopathy offers more than a "placebo effect".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article