A CASH-strapped Labour council has been scolded by one of the UK's most senior judges for "dancing on the head of a pin" with "Alice In Wonderland" legal arguments, which have cost taxpayers thousands of pounds.
Lord Wilson of Culworth, a justice at the UK's Supreme Court, made the scathing remarks last week as South Lanarkshire Council fought to keep potentially damning documents about pay a secret.
If it loses the case, the council's legal costs are expected to be around £200,000. South Lanarkshire recently warned 120 jobs were at risk in a £12 million cuts package.
In 2010, Scotland's Freedom of Information (FoI) Commissioner ordered the local authority to release details of its pay scales to equal pay campaigner Mark Irvine, who wanted to know if male and female manual workers with similar skills were on different wages.
In recent years, councils across Scotland have paid millions of pounds in compensation to female staff who were systematically underpaid. South Lanarkshire is currently fighting a £10m back pay claim from 1500 female staff.
South Lanarkshire appealed the FoI decision to Scotland's highest court, the Court of Session. It also ruled in Irvine's favour. But South Lanarkshire again refused to release the information, and last week it became the first public body in Scotland to appeal an FoI ruling all the way to the Supreme Court.
The Sunday Herald has now obtained a recording of the full proceedings.
The council argues that releasing the details could identify individual staff, breaching the Data Protection Act. But the act says the data can be disclosed if it is "necessary" for Irvine's legitimate interest.
The council spent most of its time at last Monday's one-day hearing arguing over the exact definition of "necessary", and whether it meant "essential" or not, and thus whether the council had to release the information or not.
Sarah Wolffe QC, said that from the council's perspective, "necessary" meant "more than facilitate or be convenient" but less than "absolutely necessary or strictly".
Lord Wilson interrupted to tell Wolffe: "This is becoming Alice In Wonderland - Alice Through The Looking Glass.
"You've spent almost two hours discussing the meaning of the word 'necessary' and you've been most nimbly dancing on the head of a pin."
Wolffe replied: "I hope the court wouldn't, wouldn't feel that, would regard the submissions that I have advanced as that kind of submission. I'm not a very good dancer."
A few moments later, Lady Hale, deputy president of the Supreme Court, told Wolffe: "I think you've had enough assault on this subject. Can we move on to the next point?"
The FoI Commissioner's counsel, Dean of the Faculty of Advocates Richard Keen, later argued that releasing the information was "proportionate".
Irvine said: "If South Lanarkshire loses its appeal, this may require the council leader, Eddie McAvoy, to consider his position. As in Alice In Wonderland, it may be time to say, 'Off with his head!'"
South Lanarkshire SNP councillor Peter Craig said: "Hiring big lawyers to put a case as weak as that is a waste of public money."
A South Lanarkshire Council spokeswoman said: "It would be inappropriate for any of the parties concerned to comment while the judges consider their judgment."
The Supreme Court is expected to deliver its verdict in the autumn.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article