A Council is facing a record equal-pay bill of more than £100 million, after agreeing to final settlement talks following years of resisting claims from 3000 female staff.
Labour-run South Lanarkshire, which lost a related case at the UK Supreme Court, has caved in to growing pressure and agreed to three months of discussions, rather than resume Employment Tribunal hearings in Glasgow next month.
Similar cases cost Glasgow City Council more than £50m several years ago and although South Lanarkshire is a smaller authority it is believed its refusal to settle going back many more years, and more serious breaches of equal pay, could see the council pay a heavier price.
The lawyer representing the women, Stefan Cross, QC, of Action 4 Equality (Scotland), said: "This is a very significant development. It is, however, only the first step with no guarantees of success."
The council's U-turn follows its recent loss of a crucial appeal case at the UK Supreme Court.
In the first case of its kind involving a Scottish public body, the council had asked the court to overturn an order by the Scottish Information Commissioner to release pay data under the Freedom Of Information Act.
The Court Of Session, Scotland's highest court, had already ruled the information should be released to equal pay campaigner Mark Irvine, but the council refused, ultimately landing it with a £200,000 legal bill.
When the data was released, it suggested male manual workers had been systematically paid more than female staff with the same skill levels, despite the two groups in theory being paid the same hourly wages.
Council leader Eddie McAvoy, who has been in office since 1999, throughout the time of the unfair pay, faces calls to resign.
The council is already being taken to a tribunal by 3000 female workers claiming more than £10m in back pay, with a hearing due in October.
Mr McAvoy said: "I am pleased there have been positive moves on this issue and I look forward to further progress being made."
Carol Fox, of Fox and Partners, who is also representing some of the women, said: "We are always focussed on the needs of our claimants and hope we can agree favourable terms in the near future."
Mr Irvine said: "Goodness knows what the trade unions will make of this development, after siding with the council all these years and actively discouraging their lowest paid members from submitting equal pay claims.
"In my view, the trade unions in South Lanarkshire should hang their heads in shame, as they have no credibility with their members after their craven behaviour."
Agnes Mills, 66, a home carer, from Halfway, Cambuslang, is one worker who stands to receive a pay-out when the cases are settled.
She said: "I put in my claim when we heard about it in 2005 and I have been waiting all that time for an answer.
"I was a home help for 30 years. I remember a letter from the council saying I should speak to my union, but the union rep took the letter away as if I shouldn't have had it.
"Then I heard about men getting money and I joined the application. I remember at one point I had to sign a will form in case I died before winning. I thought I would die before I got anything, but from today I think I might win."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article