A LEADING Scots environmental campaigner has accused a firm planning to extract methane gas from coal beds near Falkirk of trying to gag him with the threat of legal action after he spoke out publicly against the scheme.
Dr Richard Dixon, who is both a board member at the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (Sepa) and director of Friends of the Earth Scotland, said Dart Energy accused him of a conflict of interest after he took to Twitter to launch an attack on the firm's plans to drill 22 wells at 14 sites at Airth and in the Forth Valley.
Dr Dixon was contacted by the company's lawyers over his tweets, which used an image of the Dart Energy logo but changed it to read: "Daft Energy: You'd be daft to invest in us."
The firm was also concerned about claims that it was 'desperate' to raise finance in Australia.
He said the company demanded he stop tweeting about it and threatened him with legal action if he did not sign a letter stating he would comply, remove any tweets from his Twitter feed relating to Dart and refrain from posting any further comments about its activities.
Dart Energy is currently waiting on the Scottish Government to rule on its plans, which have been fiercely opposed by 2500 people in the area and Friends of the Earth Scotland.
However, the threat of legal action was lifted after Dr Dixon wrote to Dart to inform them he always declares an interest at Sepa board meetings if there is an agenda item related to an active campaign of Friends of the Earth Scotland.
He said: "It's a pretty scary experience to be faced with legal action from a multimillion-pound company. This attempt to gag my comments has backfired and instead it has brought the issues relating to fracking and coal bed methane extraction in Scotland to a larger audience.
"I received a letter from Dart which was a climbdown on their previous correspondence and stated that since I was tweeting on behalf of Friends of the Earth Scotland they would not pursue the matter further.
"Many more people have now learned about our campaign and opposition to their proposals for coal bed methane extraction than if they had never got in touch threatening me with legal action.
He added: "This is an embarrassing climb-down for Dart and a victory for campaigners everywhere, Friends of the Earth Scotland and also freedom of speech."
A spokesman for Dart Energy said the letter was addressed to Dr Dixon personally in relation to his board membership of Sepa and was not a matter for Friends of the Earth Scotland.
He said: "The letter was only sent to the Friends of the Earth Scotland address as we did not have his personal address.
"A close inspection of the letter from Levy & McRae will make clear that Dart Energy's concerns were with regard to his position on the board of Sepa and had nothing to do with his role at Friends of the Earth Scotland."
He added: "That Richard Dixon has chosen to widely publicise the "private and confidential" correspondence as an attack on Friends of the Earth Scotland amply demonstrates the acute level of his personal antipathy towards Dart Energy and is further evidence of why we questioned his conflicted position with regard to discussions about Dart Energy's licences as a Board Member of Sepa."
Sepa said it was aware of Dr Dixon's association with FoE Scotland and that a full list of all its board members' interests was on its website.
The statement added: "Dr Dixon, like all board members in public bodies, has a duty to ensure that any interests are declared openly." It said they are recorded on its website.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article