A SENIOR manager with one of Scotland's largest bus companies has branded proposals to force operators to run socially needed but unprofitable routes as "immoral" and a breach of human rights.
Edward Hodgson, managing director of Stagecoach West Scotland, said a bid to re-regulate the bus industry in Scotland would set services back 30 years.
In a letter to Green Party MSP Patrick Harvie, who founded the Better Buses campaign, he said: "We doubt whether proposed legislation to confiscate the freedom to operate commercially will comply with EU Human Rights legislation, and in any event we consider such action would be immoral."
Mr Hodgson, who runs his company's Glasgow and Ayrshire bus division, went on to say the scheme "could destroy successful businesses, would offer no protection to employee job security, pay and pensions, and would shake shareholder confidence in the Scottish bus industry".
He said the plan would burden taxpayers while leaving passengers with "higher fares or lower service levels".
October 11 is the deadline for responses to Labour MSP Iain Gray's consultation on bus regulation.
Mr Gray, a former bus conductor, wants local councils to be able to bundle together profitable and loss-making routes and offer them as a package bus firms can bid for, with fines if they subsequently drop unprofitable services.
He wants to introduce a Bus Regulation (Scotland) Bill following a series of cuts by First Group to bus services in his East Lothian constituency.
Mr Gray said: "It is no surprise to me the bus operators are not keen on local authorities having more say in services. To call it immoral is a little on the hysterical side though.
"If there is anything immoral it is the number of people who have seen their bus services disappear and the number of elderly and vulnerable people who struggle to find convenient and affordable transport in their area."
He added that while he agreed there was an "imbalance" between the amount of public money allocated to trains compared to buses, operators could not expect additional funds with no strings attached. Buses are responsible for five times as many journeys as trains, but receive only a third of the funding.
Mr Harvie said Mr Hodgson's claims were "laughable". He added: "The ludicrous suggestion that it is immoral to rein in the behaviour of the free market is followed immediately by a complaint that there is not enough public subsidy.
"This is mental gymnastics of Olympic standard. Countries that manage to provide the high quality public transport Scotland deserves do it with a mix of regulation, subsidy, and, in some cases, public ownership."
However, George Mair, the director for Scotland of the Confederation of Passenger Transport, which represents bus operators, said the proposals were "unacceptable and unworkable" and could see successful bus companies robbed of some of their most profitable routes.
A spokesman for Stagecoach said operators had already paid £90 million to buy the former state-owned bus companies.
He said: "Iain Gray's plans would be the transport equivalent of someone who had bought their council house from a local authority, spent money investing in the property over many years, having it compulsorily put up for auction and then told they would receive none of the proceeds.
"Iain Gray wants a Bill about buses, but it would mean a huge bill landing on the doormats of bus passengers and taxpayers."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article