THE Catholic cleric appointed in the wake of Cardinal Keith O'Brien's departure has warned of a "drift" within the Church unless the Vatican moves to address a vacuum within the senior clergy in Scotland.
Archbishop of St Andrews and Edinburgh Leo Cushley said he would be delighted if Pope Francis considered the appointment of new Scottish bishops in the short term to fill a number of vacancies.
Of the eight dioceses in Scotland, currently only four have full-time bishops not waiting to leave - Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Argyll and the Isles.
"There are a couple of good lads out there. I thought one of them would get this job. And hopefully that means one of them is now free to go somewhere else," Archbishop Cushley said.
"I think we all have a fair idea of who these candidates might be but that's something done in its own way. It may take a while.
"There's a rhythm of work that's beyond our control that involves the Nuncio piecing things together, proposing names, an examination of each candidate, collaboration of those in Scotland, that goes to Rome and depending on the bulk of work Rome has to deal with."
He added: "It could be six months before we see the next [bishop] but that's a complete guess.
However, we are a small country with a small number of bishops and we are going to need them sooner or later because when there's a vacuum at the top it starts, quietly, slowly but surely, to drift.
So I'd be delighted if the Holy Father gets round to looking at Scotland again as soon as possible."
Monsignor Patrick Burke, a Scottish Vatican official who was close to Pope Benedict XVI, is among those being touted for one of the posts.
Last week, in his first interview since his appointment, the new Archbishop signalled a shift away from focussing on moral issues, telling The Herald his priority while in office would be furthering the church's standing on tackling social problems.
Before taking up the post in Edinburgh, Archbishop Cushley was a diplomat in the Vatican and during his career served in Burundi and Rwanda in east central Africa.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article