PROSECUTORS have begun the task of trying to persuade judges that a man cleared of the 1977 World's End murders should stand trial again.
It is the first such case to be considered by the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh since a change in the law relaxed the "double jeopardy" rule.
The legal debate is expected to last two weeks - but details cannot be reported.
Lord Justice Clerk Lord Carloway, sitting with Lady Dorrian and Lord Bracadale will eventually rule on whether the earlier acquittal of 68-year-old Angus Sinclair should be quashed - paving the way for a new trial.
The bodies of Christine Eadie and Helen Scott, both 17, were found in East Lothian after they had been seen drinking in the World's End pub in the Royal Mile, Edinburgh.
Sinclair faced charges of rape and murder until the September 2007 trial was brought to an end when judge Lord Clarke ruled there was no case to answer.
Since then the Scottish Parliament has passed the Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Act 2011.
Lord Advocate Frank Mulholland, QC - who is ultimately responsible for all prosecutions in Scotland - has used the Act to bring the case back to court.
Before the legal arguments began yesterday he told the appeal judges he was aware of media interest because this was the first application made under the Act.
Defence QC Ian Duguid, for Sinclair, is opposing the retrial move.
A decision is expected, in writing, at a later date.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article