Philip Hammond will recommend the second Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier is brought into service rather than mothballed or sold.
The Defence Secretary told a conference fringe event the £70 million annual running costs would have to be found by cutting something else.
The first of the 920ft-long vessels, weighing 65,000 tonnes is under construction at Rosyth Dockyard in Fife.
The second, HMS Prince of Wales is also under construction at shipyards across the United Kingdom.
Mr Hammond said the costs involved in bringing the second ship into full service were small given the cost of building it.
Previously announced plans had suggested the HMS Queen Elizabeth would come into service on completion, but the Prince of Wales could be kept back pending a decision at the 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR).
Mr Hammond said: "It's got to be a decision for the SDSR. My recommendation would be we should try to support the use of the second carrier.
"I think having put the money we have into building the carriers, for the sake of about £70 million per year being able to operate the second carrier looks like a snip.
"But it does mean we have to stop doing something else. If we spend an extra £70 million a year to be able to operate two carriers, which gives us a guaranteed one permanently available to go to sea, if we do that we will have to stop doing something else.
"All these things are about choices and priorities, what are we going to give up in order to do something that needs to be done."
Queen Elizabeth will be the lead ship of the class of aircraft carrier and is scheduled to start sea trials in 2017.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article