ARCHAEOLOGISTS believe they have unearthed evidence of a medieval Viking parliament buried under a Highland car park.
Excavations at Cromartie Memorial car park in Dingwall have uncovered remains of a mound which would have served as a gathering place for 11th century nobles and chieftains.
Thought to have been built by the Norse earl Thorfinn the Mighty, the mound would have been sited on a man-made island on the river Peffery.
Thorfinn, who died in 1065, is believed to have laid the foundations of what would later become the royal burgh of Dingwall. Experts say a road, ditch and an aquaduct, known as the Water of Dyke, were also constructed when Thorfinn was in control of Ross-shire and large parts of the north of Scotland.
The parliament, called a Thing, was included in an 18th century plan of the town. Other sites known to have been sited Things in Scotland can also be found in Shetland and Orkney.
Thorfinn's rise to power was aided by his victory in a battle at Torfnes on the south side of the Cromarty Firth, and he grew to become lord of Caithness, Shetland and Orkney.
OJT Heritage and Dingwall History Society were involved in excavating parts of Cromartie Memorial car park, which is on a piece of land known as the Hillyard.
Radio carbon dating of earth samples indicated the mound had been constructed in the estuary of the Peffery around the mid-11th Century.
David MacDonald was commissioned to put together a historical investigative report on the thing site.
Mr MacDonald said: "That dating is consistent with the period in which, following his victory at Torfnes until his death, Earl Thorfinn the Mighty had exercised authority over Ross."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article