SCOTLAND's Catholic Church is dealing with an average of six allegations of abuse a year, half of them historic.
For the first time, the country's eight dioceses yesterday published full figures for complaints received against its clergy, volunteers and parishioners.
The Church, in an audit of abuse allegations involving children or vulnerable adults, said fully 27% of complaints were against individuals who are now dead. Some 55% of them were sexual in nature. There have been no prosecutions in respect of 61% of all cases.
Archbishop Philip Tartaglia, president of the Bishops' Conference, said: "We recognise the trauma and pain that survivors of abuse have suffered and we are committed to providing for them both justice and healing."
He said that 2013 had been "a test of faith" for Catholics but the Church was committed to "consolidation of our safeguarding practices, the renewal of trust in our unshakable commitment to atoning for abuse in the past, guarding against abuse in the present and eliminating abuse in the future, and supporting those who have been harmed".
It emerged in August that the Bishops' Conference had commissioned an independent examination into historic allegations of abuse back in 2011, but this was halted by the then-president, Cardinal Keith O'Brien.
He withdrew his support for the review a year before resigning over his own inappropriate sexual conduct.
The Church has published the results of its Diocesan Safeguarding Audits from 2006-12, giving a breakdown of reported incidents.
A total of 46 allegations were reported, of which 55% related to sexual abuse, 19% to physical abuse, 11% were allegations of verbal abuse and 15% were in connection with emotional abuse.
Of those accused, 56% were priests, 22% were volunteers, 11% were parishioners and the remainder were staff or other people connected to the church.
Catholics across Scotland were told at Mass on Sunday the audit was to be published.
The report revealed the ministry of almost a quarter (24%) of those accused had been restricted. A further 12% had been removed from their post, while 11% left voluntarily, 8% were dismissed, 3% were in prison and another 3% had been acquitted. The outcome of the remaining 11% of cases was unknown.
Helen Holland, a victim of sex abuse in the 1960s and 70s, welcome the audit as "a step in the right direction". But the campaigner warned the real hurt of historic abuse had still to be aired.
She said: "This is like picking at a scab and then putting a plaster on it. There is still bleeding under the plaster."
There are still questions over how the Church responded in the past to allegations of serious criminal activity, said Ms Holland, who went on to become a nun herself, but eventually left her order. "Moving those accused of abuse amounted, in my view," she said, "to an attempt to pervert the course of justice."
The audit also listed complaints made against religious orders - counted separately to those against the mainstream church - and amounting to 18 between 2009 and 2012.
The Church has also ordered a review of its safeguarding procedures, to be led by Andrew McLellan, a former Moderator Of The General Assembly Of The Church Of Scotland.
He said: "I am pleased to be able to help the Church in what has been for them a difficult year. But my first concern is not to support the Church: rather it is to seek the best protection of many vulnerable children and adults."
The Church will also compile numbers for all abuse claims made from 1947 to 2005.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article