AN INDEPENDENT Scotland would be owed £4.7 billion in defence assets and cash by the rest of the UK even after taking military hardware identified in SNP defence plans, the party has claimed.
SNP defence spokesman Angus Robertson said Scotland's share of UK defence assets amounted to £7.7bn.
The party's defence plans are based on taking hardware valued at £1.6bn and land worth £1.4bn, leaving a debt of £4.7bn owed by the UK, the MP claimed.
He said his figures, based on answers to parliamentary questions, showed an independent Scotland could meet the start-up costs of creating a new military force. He said: "Scotland's fair share of existing defence assets will make an excellent start to better defence arrangements after independence."
The Scottish Government's defence plan includes taking two Type 23 frigates, worth £150m between them, four minesweepers, valued at £134m, and 16 Typhoon fighter jets, worth £977m.
Land and property inherited by the proposed Scottish Defence Force would include the Faslane naval base on the Clyde, the Leuchars and Lossiemouth RAF bases.
The SNP has faced claims it could not run its planned forces for the £2.5bn annual budget set out in its independence White Paper.
An MoD spokeswoman said: "This demonstrates the SNP's total lack of understanding of how defence works. These proposals... would leave the Scottish people less secure than they are as part of the UK."
Meanwhile, English campaigners have urged Scots to vote for independence.
The 30-strong group, headed by Anthony Barnett, founder of the Charter88 group which campaigned for a written constitution, said the prospect of Scottish independence was "thrilling".
The group includes environmental campaigners and Green Party figures, including former London mayoral candidate Sian Berry.
In a statement, they said: "The Scots have the opportunity to set an example for us all, and so to help we English liberate ourselves too."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article