CONSERVATIONISTS have welcomed a "major U-turn" by an energy company, which has withdrawn plans for a wind farm that was to be the subject of a public inquiry.
SSE said yesterday it would no longer apply to build the Dalnessie wind farm in Sutherland. It is also dropping plans to construct an extension to the Fairburn wind farm in Glen Orrin, Ross-shire.
Dalnessie was one of two developments to be examined by public inquiries following objections from the Highland Council. The John Muir Trust had also opposed the application on the grounds that it was on an area of wild land.
Helen McDade, head of policy at the John Muir Trust, said: "This is a major U-turn by SSE and a victory for those who want to see Scotland's wild land protected against large-scale, industrial-style development.
"This wind farm would have involved not just the erection of dozens of turbines, but the excavation of thousands of tonnes of rock and the construction of tens of miles of access roads on a spectacular wild landscape.
"This was an unsuitable development that should never have been brought forward in the first place. It has wasted a huge amount of time, effort and money, with councillors, planning officials, local communities, environmentalists and SSE all involved in the process."
SSE said the decision to withdraw the applications was made because continued investment was no longer financially viable.
Colin Nicol, SSE Director of Onshore Renewables, said: "The decision to end Dalnessie and Fairburn Extension means that we can redirect resource."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article