A MASSIVE Highland wind farm proposal which could make the Scottish Conservatives' environment spokesman more than £8 million has been damned by the nation's environment watchdog.
Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) has warned that the huge Ardchonnel wind farm in Argyll would have "significant adverse impacts" on local villages and the skyline, spoiling the countryside "for residents and visitors alike". It also says the development is "out of scale" with the surrounding landscape.
The Ardchonnel scheme, which is being developed by German energy firm RWE Innogy, is on a 3500-acre estate owned by Tory MSP Sir Jamie McGrigor, who stands to earn more than £300,000 a year in rent for 25 years if the project goes ahead.
The scheme would see 15 turbines 111m (364ft) tall erected above Loch Awe, generating up to 45 megawatts - enough to power 40% of the homes in the Argyll and Bute Council area.
It has been denounced by dozens of McGrigor's constituents, who fear it will be a noisy eyesore and kill the local tourist trade.
The nearby hamlet of Dalavich could become a "ghost village", residents have warned.
McGrigor, 64, an Old Etonian baronet who has been a Highlands and Islands list MSP since 1999, insists the project would help the local community and provide jobs.
"The proposed location is in an area which has been identified as suitable for a renewable development of this kind," he told the Sunday Herald earlier this month.
Although SNH has not formally objected to Ardchonnel, its official advice is scathing.
In a submission last week to Argyll and Bute Council, which is handling the planning application, SNH says the proposal "will have significant adverse visual impacts" when viewed from some villages and parts of the loch.
The proposal is "not in keeping" with local wind farm advice, "nor Scottish planning policy" it says.
If approved, the wind farm would become a "dominating feature in views from Dalavich and Inverinan from where it will be overwhelming both horizontally and vertically in the undulating skyline".
It goes on: "A wind farm development of this scale is likely to undermine the landscape experience of enjoying the countryside for residents and visitors alike.
"We advise that this proposal is out of scale with the receiving landscape and is likely to undermine the landscape character."
Viewed from the north and north-west, Ardchonnel would be seen alongside the smaller An Suidhe wind farm "creating a confusing image of differing turbine sizes and rotations".
Sited in an area used by six rare bird species - golden eagle, red throated diver, white-tailed eagle, osprey, merlin and peregrine falcon - the development would also "contribute to the degradation" of bird habitats in Argyll.
Even with mitigation, "we consider that the impacts of the wind farm, whilst reduced, will remain significant and adverse", SNH concludes.
Argyll and Bute Council is due to consider the application before the end of May.
In 2008, McGrigor signed a parliamentary motion demanding wind farms rules to end "speculative applications ... threatening scenic areas".
However, in 2011 he struck a deal to let RWE erect a wind farm on land used for sheep grazing. If the plan is approved, he would receive £7000 a year for each megawatt of installed capacity, or £315,000 a year for the 45MW proposed. Index-linked over the 25-year life of the turbines, that would make him more than £8m.
RWE Innogy said: "SNH as statutory consultees have reviewed the application and provided comments that we are now considering. However, SNH have not objected to the development."
McGrigor said: "While I understand that some object to this development, there are many others who are very supportive, including two community councils.
"It has the potential to be of substantial benefit to the community, providing an annual income that will make the area more sustainable, while providing valuable jobs.
"I'm reassured the appropriate environmental impact studies have been carried out."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article