FRIENDS of the Earth has backed the Scottish Government in a war of words with Westminster over nuclear power.
UK Energy Minister Michael Fallon has tried to block Holyrood ministers from taking part in a European Commission investigation into No 10 plans to subsidise a new nuclear plant in England. Mr Fallon told his opposite number at Holyrood, Fergus Ewing, that any representation to Brussels on plans to support a power station at Hinkley Point in Somerset would be viewed as a "hostile act".
The Scottish Government, which opposes nuclear energy, is understood to be concerned about the Hinkley Point project, not least because it could pose competition to renewable exports from north of the Border.
These views are shared by Friends of the Earth. Its director, Richard Dixon, said yesterday: "The UK Government's obsession with getting new nuclear at any cost is a direct threat to investment in renewables and efficiency. The bottom line is that Scotland is rich in clean, green energy sources, and green electricity will be in demand more and more as the rest of the UK and countries in Europe try to cut climate emissions.
"If Europe eventually clears the way UK electricity consumers will be paying around a billion a year for 35 years to subsidise only two reactors in England.
"Just a fraction of this money would see the widespread rollout of renewables and improvements in energy efficiency."
A spokeswoman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change stressed that Scotland WAS "part of the UK member state in the EU and cannot act as a separate entity".
Mr Ewing, if he has concerns, should raise them with Whitehall, not Brussels, she said.
She added: "It would not be acceptable for one part of the same member state to intervene against policy proposals from another."
Earlier this year EC signalled that the UK's deal with France's EDF to build a new plant at Hinkley may amount to illegal state aid.
SNP MSP Dennis Robertson said the UK stance was "completely unacceptable."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article