TWO senior members of staff from a college in one of the most deprived parts of Scotland have shared a severance package of nearly £500,000, prompting anger from lecturers.
Ronnie Knox, the former principal of North Glasgow College, and John Gray, his vice-principal, received £471,000 of public money between them under the deal, which followed the college's merger with two other institutions. Mr Knox, who received a salary of about £120,000, was given a payout of more than £310,000, while Mr Gray, who earned £80,000, received more than £160,000.
A report into the payments by Audit Scotland has also raised the issue of transparency over the way the payments were sanctioned, stating there was no evidence they were subjected to "appropriate approval" or assessed as providing value for money.
Caroline Gardner, the Auditor General for Scotland, stressed to a meeting of the Scottish Parliament's Audit Committee, which has discussed the issue, that there was no evidence the payments were wrongly calculated, illegal or fraudulent.
But she told MSPs: "The report is here because I believe that, where public money is involved, it is very important that there is a fair, open and transparent process to ensure that decisions are made properly and represent value for money, and that they are properly scrutinised and challenged by those who have governance responsibilities."
A spokesman for the Educational Institute of Scotland said: "While we do not comment on the detail of individual cases, there will clearly be significant concern when substantial financial settlements are awarded to senior staff without an appropriate level of transparency."
However, Mr Knox said yesterday: "The way the payments were sanctioned and the amount that was agreed on was nothing to do with me."
Mr Gray could not be contacted for comment.
A spokesman for the Scottish Funding Council said colleges made their own decisions about staff matters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article