DEVELOPERS have withdrawn plans for a 14-turbine wind farm in a Dumfries and Galloway beauty spot following concerns it could damage an internationally-important wildlife site.
Community Wind Power Ltd, which had planned the wind farm for an area of moorland two-and-a-half miles north of Sanquhar now plans to amend their proposals to try and overcome the objections.
Concerns were raised about the impact the proposals would have on wildlife and objections were lodged by RSPB Scotland, Scottish Natural Heritage and many concerned individuals.
The site is part of the Muirkirk and north Lowther Uplands Special Protection Area (SPA) and is important for threatened wildlife, such as hen harriers, peregrines and short-eared owls, say conservationists.
Scottish Natural Heritage also raised concerns that the scheme will create a "corridor effect" where turbines would be visible on either side of Nithsdale.
Kate Bellew, conservation planner for RSPB Scotland, said: "This is very welcome news and absolutely the right decision.
"We have always maintained that this is a completely unsuitable place for a wind farm due to its importance for rare species.
"The developers, Community Wind Power Ltd, deserve credit for recognising how harmful this development would have been for wildlife and for abandoning their plans."
Ron Wood, managing director of Community Wind Power, said plans were withdrawn "in order for us to undertake and complete the necessary work and consultation to overturn and remove these consultee objections".
The company aims to resubmit the plans.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article