Environmentalists have launched legal action to block the decision to approve, without a public inquiry, SSE's plans for the largest wind farm yet in the Highlands.
The John Muir Trust has now lodged a petition to the Court of Session asking for a judicial review of the decision in June by Energy Minister Fergus Ewing to grant consent to the 67-turbine Stronelairg wind farm in the Monadhliath Mountains between the A9 and Loch Ness.
When granting approval Mr Ewing had said it would help "keep the lights on across our islands at a time where there is an increasingly tight gap between electricity supply and demand". But John Hutchison, chairman of the John Muir Trust (JMT) said: "It was opposed by both the government's own advisory body on nature and landscape, SNH, and by the Cairngorms National Park Authority."
Because of the scale of the development and opposition, it should have been the subject of a Public Local Inquiry, he said, and therefore in the absence of "proper democratic scrutiny" the JMT had to act.
Meanwhile a public inquiry into a 24 turbine wind farm in Caithness, will test ministers' commitment to protecting wild land, the JMT claim. Limekiln's highest turbines at 456ft would be twice the size of Edinburgh's Scott Monument to blade tip, while the 2,718 acre site, is equivalent to 1,500 football pitches, less than two miles south west of Dounreay. and close to one of Scotland's 42 new Wild Land Areas.
The final map of Scotland's wildest land was published in June, to help the planning process ensure there are no inappropriate developments there.
The JMT says The Limekiln wind farm would visually affect 15 per cent of East Halladale Flows Wild Land Area.
Developers Infinergy say they varied the heights of turbines that could power 40,200 households.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article