The world famous library designed by Charles Rennie Mackintosh, which was destroyed in the fire at the Glasgow School Of Art, should not be rebuilt as a "Mockintosh" copy, according to an expert.
David Mullane, a former director of the Charles Rennie Mackintosh Society, who chairs the Friends Of The GSA organisation, believes a rebuilt version of library could be an "embarrassment" and a prime example of "Mockintosh".
The Art School is to hold a symposium on the question of how to replace the library - which was gutted in the fire on May 23, although the archives were saved - but Mr Mullane believes Mackintosh's original cannot be "effectively replicated".
He will argue his case, speaking in a personal capacity, at a debate to be held by the Charles Rennie Mackintosh Society on the future of the library on September 25. It will be held at the Mackintosh-designed Queen's Cross Church in Glasgow.
The Art School intends to "restore and rebuild the Mackintosh Building, including the iconic library, and to rebuild well", a spokeswoman said last night.
However, Mr Mullane said: "I believe works of art, if damaged, can be restored.
"The library, however, has been completely destroyed and the library is a work of art.
"It is Glasgow School Of Art's intention the library will be rebuilt, based upon drawings and photographs.
"It is my contention it may well be an embarrassment, which will be referred to as Mockintosh."
He believes other artists and Mackintosh fans feel the same way about the design classic, although he realises his view is not shared by all.
Mr Mullane believes that instead of following the plans of Mackintosh and rebuilding the library as it was, the GSA should commission a modern architect to create a new space for students to work and converse.
"When I speak to students, they say they would like a high functioning space, somewhat like a common room - in Mackintosh's designs there were little booths, but we need more than that these days," he said.
"I would love to see a tender put out to attract one of the creative architects working in the world today.
"That seems preferable, to be proud of that - rather than constantly apologising beause the library burnt down and it had to be rebuilt."
At the debate, entitled Reinstate Or Reinvent: A Debate On The Future Of The Gsa Mackintosh Library, the opposing view will be presented by Michael Davis, a historian and architectural conservationist.
A spokeswoman for Art School said: "It is the intention of the Glasgow School Of Art to restore and rebuild the Mackintosh Building, including the iconic library, and to rebuild well.
"We are in the process of appointing an architectural practice to lead the restoration and rebuild of the Mackintosh Building, and will be holding two international symposia to inform the restoration process."
At the forthcoming Venice Biennale Of Architecture, the first of two symposiums will be held to discuss the restoration of the Mackintosh Building, with the second being held next spring in Glasgow.
Professor Christopher Platt, head of the Mackintosh School Of Architecture at GSA, said: "What should the plans be for bringing the Mackintosh Building into full use once more and how should we approach the particular issue of the Macintosh Library?
"These are highly complex questions and by necessity any discussion must involve contributions from many different people and organisations from across the world.
"We will therefore host two symposia, the first in Venice this autumn and the second in Glasgow next spring, to explore the future of a space beloved by so many."
He added: "We have decided to focus on the topic of the Mackintosh Library specifically as this is the most delicate and culturally and intellectually significant aspect of the entire post-fire work."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article