An independent Scotland will have to decide whether to classify thousands of species that only occur south of the border as alien, according to a leading wildlife expert.
Professor Chris Thomas, a biologist from the University of York, is warning that labelling as non-native birds, butterflies and other species that move north because of global warming would create "one big headache".
He points out that other countries signed up to international agreements to protect wildlife have developed policies for non-native species.
But Mr Thomas argues that it would be a bad idea to define English plants and animals as alien, and resist their arrival in Scotland.
The rising temperatures caused by climate pollution are driving many species north, he says, and they should be welcomed.
Among the species that could cross the border is the Essex skipper butterfly, which is seen as an invasive species in North America. Historically a native of southern England, it has been spreading northwards.
Birds that may be northward bound from England include the Dartford warbler, Cetti's warbler and the avocet.
In June it was reported that the tree bumblebee had arrived in eastern Scotland for the first time from England.
"It would be very important that an independent Scotland should welcome biological invaders from England, rather than classify thousands of British-but-not-Scottish species as foreign and be either ambivalent towards them or - worse - antagonistic," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article