CAMPAIGNERS have called for communities to oppose fracking after the owners of Scotland's largest petro-chemical plant announced plans for a major expansion of the controversial process north of the Border.
Ineos, the owners of the Grangemouth plant, has announced £640 million plans for shale gas exploration and appraisal in a move which could make it the biggest player in the industry in the UK.
It already has two licences for extracting the natural resource from under the ground near its Grangemouth refinery, but is applying for more in Scotland and the north of England.
Green Party MSP Patrick Harvie said it would face opposition from people living in towns and villages who fear the process would blight their lives. Greenpeace accused the firm of jumping on the shale gas bandwagon.
Mr Harvie said with climate change scientists suggesting the world has access to far more fossil fuel that it can safely burn, the public would be justified in opposing such "risky new techniques for extracting more gas."
He said: "We should be looking to use our existing hydrocarbon supplies carefully and within limits, rather than chasing more, as well as investing in clean technology that delivers long-term jobs and a safe environment.
"If Ineos think they can easily frack the Forth Valley they've got another thing coming. This is a highly-populated area, and we've already seen serious opposition mobilised in local communities where coal bed methane drilling has been proposed.
"Anyone thinking of fracking in Scotland's central belt will face a similar wave of protest."
Greenpeace UK accused Ineos' move as a 'speculative bet' on a fuel source which is unproven and risky. Campaigner Simon Clydesdale said: "Ineos have jumped on a spin-powered bandwagon which is going nowhere. It seems that Ineos have based their business plan on breathless PR brochures rather than scientific reports."
Labour's shadow energy minister Tom Greatrex, the MP for Rutherglen and Hamilton West, added: "Shale gas extraction cannot go ahead unless we have a system of robust environmental regulation and comprehensive inspection."
He accused the Coalition Government of sideling legitimate environmental concerns.
However, Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Murdo Fraser said shale gas represented a huge opportunity, adding: "It is good to see that Ineos is intent on maximising its potential."
Hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, involves pumping water, chemicals and sand at high pressure underground to fracture shale rock and release gas.
Making the announcement of the company's plans, Ineos boss Jim Ratcliffe said: "I believe shale gas could revolutionise UK manufacturing and I know Ineos has the resources to make it happen, the skills to extract the gas safely and the vision to realise that everyone must share in the rewards."
Ineos said it had put forward proposals for the monitoring of methane in the groundwater, environmental impact assessments and a statutory 12-month monitoring period, but these were rejected by the UK Government.
Chief executive Gary Haywood said wells had been built next to schools, churches and houses in the US, sometimes in the centre of large towns. But the company stressed they did not think it would be necessary to drill wells in densely populated areas, with many applications in rural areas. Drilling can be done without too much disruption, he added.
The Scottish Government said it believed an evidence-based approach to fracking was needed, including ensuring strong environmental protection and making sure that the views of communities are taken into account. A spokesman said: "As has been recognised by environmental NGOs, our approach is in stark contrast to the approach of the UK Government.
"In particular the Scottish Government has strongly opposed the UK Government's plans to grant automatic drilling access rights under homes no matter the views of householders."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article