SCOTTISH Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie has called for Holyrood to have "major" new powers over the welfare system and benefits, giving a strong pointer to the forthcoming plans of the Smith Commission.
Rennie used his party's autumn conference in Dunfermline to go much further than ever before on greater devolution.
Until now, the LibDems have said the welfare system should be harmonised across the UK.
In October 2012, a party commission headed by former leader Sir Menzies Campbell endorsed "the retention of a single United Kingdom welfare and pensions system" - a stance Rennie also backed.
However, in his speech yesterday, Rennie said he had changed his position and asked his negotiating team at the Smith Commission to "explore the transfer of a major package of welfare powers to the Scottish Parliament".
Rennie's advertisement of the negotiating shift suggested it had already met with success.
He told delegates: "The Campbell Commission clearly set out that the benefits system should be something we share across the United Kingdom in its entirety. I have reviewed that position in light of the referendum."
He said the shift would be consistent with liberal values, reflect recent debate, and, if successful, would be "good for Scotland".
He added: "With goodwill and effort we will have an agreement next week that we can all be proud of, that meets the expectations and the spirit of the referendum and which can shape Scotland for the better."
The Smith Commission is due to report on Thursday its "heads of agreement" between Labour, LibDem, Tories, SNP and Greens.
According to the timetable laid down in the Unionist "vow" before the referendum, this agreement should be translated into draft legislation in the New Year, with the new powers put into law following the General Election.
Rennie also called on Nicola Sturgeon to put the treatment of mental and physical health on an equal legal footing through new legislation. The UK Coalition Government has written into law that, for the first time ever, mental health and physical health deserve equal recognition.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article