Scottish ministers are coming under pressure from an SNP-led committee of MSPs to end their repeated failure to meet climate targets by making major cuts in pollution from farming, housing and transport.
Farmers need to reduce their use of polluting chemical fertilisers, householders should be helped to better insulate old and leaky homes, and motorists should be persuaded to opt for cleaner electric and hybrid cars, MSPs say.
In a sharply worded submission this weekend, the Scottish Parliament's environment committee is urging ministers to ensure their climate reforms "are not just words". Scotland must not abandon, or water down, its world-leading ambitions to combat climate change, the committee says.
The Scottish Government has so far missed every statutory annual target to reduce carbon emissions in 2010, 2011 and 2012. This is a "disappointment", the committee says, and leaves ministers facing "significant difficulties" in meeting future targets.
Ministers have suggested lowering the climate targets to make meeting them easier. But this has been roundly rejected by MSPs on the committee as it "would send the wrong global message".
The intervention from the Rural Affairs, Climate Change and Environment Committee (RACCE) comes on the eve of the latest global climate summit, which opens in Lima, Peru, tomorrow. The new Scottish Climate Change Minister, Aileen McLeod, is expected to attend.
The committee's convener, SNP MSP Rob Gibson, has written McLeod a seven-page letter, which has been seen by the Sunday Herald. It calls for "urgent action" in response to the missed targets.
"The committee is concerned about the cumulative negative impact of the missed annual targets and would therefore like to see increased efforts across all sectors and parts of society in Scotland to make every effort possible to try and achieve each annual target," the letter says.
The failure of the agricultural sector to take up measures to cut carbon emissions such as reducing fertiliser use needs to be "urgently addressed", say the MSPs, who argue that if voluntary measures are shown not to work, mandatory moves should be considered.
McLeod is also asked to outline the action she is going to take to lower the energy wasted by "hard to heat and hard to treat" homes, and to combat rural and fuel poverty. On transport, the committee wants action to boost the use of electric cars by standardising charging points.
Gibson said: "We need to ensure phrases such as 'all ministers are climate change ministers' and 'all committees are climate change committees' are not just words and that responsibilities are understood and taken seriously."
The committee's move was welcomed by Stop Climate Chaos Scotland, which brings together 60 environment, faith, development and other groups. "The Scottish Government needs to come forward with an updated plan to compensate for the three missed targets and hit future ones," said the coalition's chairman, Tom Ballantine.
"It is vital that Scotland sends a positive message to the international community by delivering on our climate legislation. Scotland's emissions need to reduce year on year, in line with our Climate Act."
The Scottish Conservative MEP, Ian Duncan, who will be at the Lima climate summit, said Scotland's targets were meaningless if they remained unmet. "How do we encourage others countries at the conference to take action, when Scotland has missed every climate change target set?" he asked.
McLeod said a new Cabinet sub-committee on climate change had been set up to focus on delivering emissions reductions. She said: "Solid progress has been made towards achieving the 42% reduction in emissions by 2020 from a 1990 baseline, and this has been praised by our independent assessors."
"Our targets are world-leading and are not easy - but they are at the level the international community needs to match if the new climate treaty in Paris next year is to stand a good chance of limiting global temperature rise to no more than 2ºC."
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article