MEN could have an evolutionary edge when it comes to computer games, according to a new study.
Scientists have discovered men react 10 per cent more quickly than women to an object that poses a risk.
Males are "significantly" quicker at recognising a weapon such as a gun or knife, an Australian study found.
However, when a threat is less obvious - for example, situations when the weapon was a pen or syringe - there is no difference between the sexes.
The findings could explain why men are often swifter on the draw in virtual reality games.
Danielle Sulikowski, a psychologist at Charles Sturt University in New South Wales, asked people to find guns, weapon knives, staplers and kitchen knives among images of household objects such as shoes, clocks, bowls, chairs, books, lamps, paint brushes, bottles and mugs.
In a second experiment, syringes and pens were added.
While men needed just over 900 milliseconds to spot a knife or gun, women took up to 100 milliseconds longer.
Women outnumber male games players, accounting for 58% of mobile gamers in the US and a similar proportion in the UK.
Writing in the journal Evolutionary Psychology, Ms Sulikowski said: "We predicted the guns and weapon knives would be located more quickly than the staplers and cooking knives, and that this bias would be larger in men.
"The male advantage to locate weapons was apparent whether the weapons were depicted wielded or not. There were no sex differences in time to locate any of the non-weapon targets."
It is her belief that the male advantage is an evolutionary adaptation giving men fast responses to threats.
"Currently and historically, men have engaged in more weapons-related activities - fighting and hunting - than women," she said.
"If biases of visual attention for weapons result from selection pressures related to these activities, we would predict such biases to be stronger in men."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article