PUPILS who have a say in how their school is run are more likely to achieve even if they come from disadvantaged backgrounds, a new study has shown.
Researchers from Stirling University found secondary schools in deprived areas where pupils did better than expected in exams placed a premium on engagement with pupils.
The report, commissioned by Scotland's Commissioner for Children and Young People, found this approach helped the seven schools involved boost exam results, as well as wider achievements.
However, in all the schools that took part researchers identified areas where greater responsibility could have been given to pupils.
The report concluded: "In the schools we visited there were limits to pupil participation. We can say with confidence there was scope for doing more to both address rights and improve achievement and attainment.
"There were limits to pupils' participation in terms of what decision making could be about, who could participate in power sharing, and in the way schools were linking with their communities through participation."
Pupils on committees, older pupils and female pupils tended to have greater opportunities for engaging in "power sharing", the report found, but pupils still felt schools were primarily adult led.
Dr Greg Mannion, a senior lecturer from Stirling University's school of education, said: "This research adds new and rich accounts from young people themselves to the mounting evidence for how participation through schooling is a driver for all kinds of positive outcomes.
"For young people in these schools, doing well was clearly supported by taking part in a wide variety of activities across all of school life through which they could share in decision-making with adults with whom they had respectful and supportive relationships.
"It was noticeable that in these schools in challenging circumstances, there were many opportunities for participation in all arenas of school life and whilst young people felt schools could do more, these schools did appear to be well on the way to addressing the right of pupils to have a say."
Tam Baillie, Scotland's Commissioner for Children and Young People said the report provided evidence that the rights of children should not be an "add on", but embedded in school life.
He said: "It demonstrates that young people value strong relationships, mutual respect and understanding, between pupils and teachers as key to helping them do well at school regardless of their backgrounds or how much money their families have.
"My message is that a rights-based education which includes opportunities for engagement in real decision making is a good underpinning for raising achievement and attainment.
"You're more likely to see pupils doing well if they have the chance to make a difference and contribute to the running of school life in meaningful ways."
The research aimed to find out if the schools, which have not been named, were addressing pupils' participation and rights in ways that were distinctively supportive of pupil achievement and attainment.
Evidence showed that in the seven schools, across all areas of school life, pupils had substantial opportunities to formally and informally take part in a variety of activities, to take responsibility for organising events, make contributions to school life and have their views considered in matters that affected them.
The report followed a consultation in 2010 by the Commissioner in which young people's views suggested there was a need to know more about what might make schools fairer places.
The report identified that participation in school life happens in four different areas including the formal curriculum, the extended curriculum, decision-making groups in the school and informal areas such as the playground and social media.
The Commissioner's remit is to promote and safeguard the rights of children and young people, with particular emphasis on the rights set out in the 1989 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereCommments are closed on this article